1)

TOSFOS DH RAV ASHI AMAR ASYA TACHAS TACHAS MI'SHOR

úåñ' ã"ä øá àùé àîø àúéà úçú úçú îùåø

(Summary: Tosfos points out in which point the other Amora'im disagree with Rav Ashi.)

åùàø àîåøàé ñáøé ãàåúä â"ù àöèøéê ìòðéï îéèá, åàéï ìäåöéà îâ"ù "òéï úçú òéï" îôùèéä ãîùîò òéï îîù...

(a)

The Other Amora'im: The other Amora'im maintain that that Gezeirah Shavah is needed with regard to Meitav (See Daf 5a), in which case we cannot use it to detract from the literal interpretation of "Ayin Tachas Ayin".

àìà îãøùà àçøéúà.

(b)

The Other Amora'im (cont.): Only from a different source.

2)

TOSFOS DH ELA BE'DE'MAZIK

úåñ' ã"ä àìà áãîæé÷

(Summary: Tosfos explains the Machlokes between Rebbi Eliezer and the Tana'im who argue with him.)

ãñ"ì ìøáé àìéòæø ãäåé ëëåôø ãîùìí ãîé îæé÷, ãøçîðà ÷øééä 'ëåôø ...

(a)

Clarification: Because Rebbi Eliezer holds that it is like Kofer, who pays the value of the Mazik, since the Torah refers to it as 'Kofer' ...

'àáì àúä ìå÷ç ëåôø' ... '

1.

Source: ... (as we learned on the previous Amud) 'But you may take Kofer (for damaged limbs)'.

åúðàé ãìòéì ñ"ì ããå÷à áëåôø îùìí ãîé îæé÷ îùåí ôãéåï ðôùå.

(b)

The Other Tana'im: Whereas the other Tana'im above (See Maharsha) hold that it is by Kofer exclusively that one pays the value of the Mazik, since it is a redemption of his soul.

3)

TOSFOS DH ZILU SHUMU LEIH ARBA'AH DEVARIM

úåñ' ã"ä æéìå ùåîå ìéä ã' ãáøéí

(Summary: Tosfos explains Rav Papa bar Shmuel's mistake, and clarifies the case.)

äéä ñáåø ãàãí äæé÷å, åàåúå ÷èï ëì ëê âãåì äéä ãîëìîé ìéä åîëìí.

(a)

Clarification: He (Rav Papa bar Shmuel) thought that it was a person who had wounded him, and that the Katan was old enough to feel the embarrassment.

84b----------------------------------------84b

4)

TOSFOS DH K'NASA KMAGBIS BE'BAVEL

úåñ' ã"ä ÷ðñà ÷îâáéú áááì

(Summary: Tosfos explains the term 'K'nas in the current case.)

ìàå ãå÷à ÷ðñ, àìà îùåí ãìéú áéä çñøåï ëéñ, ÷øé ìéä '÷ðñ'.

(a)

Clarification: La'av Davka K'nas, only since there is no loss of pocket, he refers to it as 'K'nas.

5)

TOSFOS DH I NAMI IS BEIH CHESARON KIS VE'LO SHECHI'ACH LO AVDINAN SH'LICHUSAIHU

úåñ' ã"ä àé ðîé àéú áéä çñøåï ëéñ åìà ùëéç ìà òáãéðï ùìéçåúééäå

(Summary: Tosfos explains why Gezeilos and Chavalos require Mumchim and elaborates.)

åâæìåú åçáìåú ãáòé îåîçéí, ëãàîø áôø÷ ÷îà ãñðäãøéï (ãó á:) ...

(a)

Clarification: And Gezeilos and Chavalos require Mumchim, as the Gemara says in the first Perek of Sanhedrin (Daf 2b) ...

àéëà ìîéîø ãâæìåú åçáìåú îéìúà ãìà ùëéç äéà (èôé), àáì äåãàåú åäìåàåú ùëéçé.

(b)

Reason: This may be because they are not common, whereas Hoda'os and Halva'os are.

åëï éù áäîâøù (âéèéï ãó ôç: åùí).

1.

Precedent: And so the Gemara says in 'ha'Megaresh' (Gitin, Daf 88b [See Tosfos DH 'I').

åúéîä, ãáëîä î÷åîåú ùäéå ãðéï ãéðé âæìåú...

(c)

Question: There are many places (in Shas) where they judged the Dinim of Gezeilos?

áäâåæì (ì÷îï ãó öå:) 'ääåà âáøà ãâæì ôãðà ãúåøà' .

1.

Example #1: In ha'Gozel Kama (later, on Daf 96b) in the case of the man who stole a pair of oxen, and ...

åáäâåæì áúøà (ì÷îï ãó ÷èå.) 'ðøùàä âðá ñôøà' å'ääåà ãâðá âìéîà' åáäøáä î÷åîåú

2.

Example #2: ... in ha'Gozel Basra, (on Daf 115a) in the case of the man from Narsha'ah who stole a Seifer', and in many other places ...

åéù ìãçåú ãëì äðäå àééøé áúôñ...

(d)

Answer 1: One can refute all those proofs however, by establishing the case where the owners seized the stolen articles ...

àå ò"é ãà"ì 'à÷áòå ìé ãéðà ìà"é', ëãàîø áôø÷ ÷îà (ãó èå:).

1.

Answer #1 (cont.): ... or where they declared that they would fix a Din Torah in Eretz Yisrael, as the Gemara explains in the first Perek (Daf 15b).

åé"î, ããå÷à âæéìåú ùò"é çáìåú...

(e)

Answer #2: Some commentaries explain that it is specifically Gezeilos that come about through Chavalos that are not so common ...

ëâåï ãîðöå áé úøé åîçå àäããé òã ùú÷ó àçã îäï åâæì àú çáéøå, ãëé äàé âååðà ìà ùëéç [èôé], åìà òáãéðï ùìéçåúééäå.

1.

Example: ... such as where the quarrel that two people are having turns into a fight, until one of them grabs his friend's article and steals it. That is a case which is not common and where Beis-Din do therefore not 'carry out their Shelichus'.

åîòùéí áëì éåí ùàðå ãðéï ãéðé âæéìåú.

(f)

Refutation: There are cases every day however, where we judge Dinei Gezeilos.

6)

TOSFOS DH TZA'AR SHE'LO BE'MAKOM NEZEK DE'MISHTALEM MA'AN TANA

úåñ' ã"ä öòø ùìà áî÷åí ðæ÷ ãîùúìí îàï úðà

(Summary: Tosfos refers to his explanation in the second Perek.)

ôéøùúé áñåó ôø÷ á' (ãó ëå: åùí ã"ä äàé).

(a)

Reference: Tosfos already explained this at the end of the second Perek Daf 26b DH 'Hai').