THE ARGUMENT WITH R. YEHUDAH (Yerushalmi Chalah Perek 2 Halachah 1 Daf 11a)
øáðéï ã÷éñøéï áùí øáé çðéðä [ãó éà òîåã á] áîçìå÷ú
(Rabanan of Kisarin citing R. Chaninah): [Even though R. Yehudah said 'when is this',] there is an argument [with Chachamim about this. It is based on the following];
[ãáøéí éà ëã] ëì (î÷åí) [ö"ì äî÷åí] àùø úãøê ëó øâìëí áå ìëí éäéä. àéï áëìì àìà îä ùáôøè (åëøáé) [ö"ì ãáøé ø' - äâø"à] éåãä.
"Kol ha'Makom Asher Tidroch Kaf Raglechem Bo Lachem Yihyeh" - the Klal includes only the Prat (what the verse says later - Min ha'Midbar...) R. Yehudah says so;
îúéáéï ìøáé éåãä àí áñôøé àøõ éùøàì åäëúéá [éäåùò à ã] îäîãáø åäìáðåï äæä åòã äðäø äâãåì ðäø ôøú ëì àøõ äçúéí åòã äéí äâãåì îáåà äùîù éäéä âáåìëí.
Question (Chachamim, against R. Yehudah): If this discusses the borders of Eretz Yisrael [it is not needed, for it says] "meha'Midbar veha'Levanon ha'Zeh Ad ha'Nahar ha'Gadol Nehar Peras Kol Eretz ha'Chitim v'Ad ha'Yam ha'Gadol Mevo ha'Shemesh Yihyeh Gevulchem"!
àìà àí àéðå òðéï ìñôøé àøõ éùøàì úðéäå òðéï ìñôøé ç"ì.
Rather, if it is not needed for the borders of Eretz Yisrael, use it to teach about borders of Chutz la'Aretz (what Bnei Yisrael conquer all of Eretz Yisrael, even the rivers get Kedushas ha'Aretz. Therefore, the boat need not be Gosheshes. We explained this entire Sugya like MEICHAL HA'MAYIM.)
îòúä îä ùäéä ãåã äåìê åîëáù áàøí ðäøéí åáàøí öåáä éäå çééáéï (áçìä) [ö"ì áîòùøåú - äâø"à]
Consequence: If so, what David conquered in Aram Naharayim and Aram Tzovah is obligated in Ma'aseros! (GRA)
ùðééà äéà ùäéä ãåã îðéç ñôøé àøõ éùøàì åîëáù ñôøé ç"ì.
Rejection: That was different, for David left over (did not conquer all within) the borders of Eretz Yisrael, and conquered borders of Chutz la'Aretz.