hebrew
1)

What are the ramifications of "ve'Cheilek Lo Yih'yeh L'cha be'Socham"?

1.

Rashi (from Sifri): The Kohanim are also not entitled to receive a portion in the spoil that Yisrael capture from the enemy. 1

2.

Ramban, Targum Onkelos and Targum Yonasan: It means that, not only will the Kohanim not receive a full portion in the land, like any of the other tribes, but that they will not receive even a small one.


1

Refer to 18:20:151:1 and the note there.

2)

Why are the forty-eight cities of refuge not considered a portion?

1.

Ramban: Because they were for the benefit of Yisrael. 1


1

As their name suggests.

3)

What are the implications of "Ani Chelk'cha ... "?

1.

Ramban (citing Sifri): It implies that the Kohanim will eat at Hashem's Table. 1


1

With reference to the Korbanos, which are brought in Hashem's House.

4)

Rashi writes that the Kohanim have no portion in the spoils. Elazar received a Terumah of the spoils from Midyan!

1.

Riva: The verse said earlier "b'Artzam"; also this applies to "v'Chelek Lo Yihyeh Lecha." 1 Only in Eretz Yisrael they have no share.


1

Moshav Zekenim left this question difficult. He must hold that "b'Artzam" does not apply to "v'Chelek

Sefer: Perek: Pasuk:
Month: Day: Year:
Month: Day: Year:

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page
Sponsorships & Donations Readers' Feedback Mailing Lists Talmud Archives Ask the Kollel Dafyomi Weblinks Dafyomi Calendar Other Yomi calendars