1)

BUYING SHELAMIM AND TERUMAH (Yerushalmi Ma'aser Sheni Perek 3 Halachah 2 Daf 15b)

øáé áà øáé çééà áùí øáé éåçðï ùìîéí ùì÷çï áëñó îòùø ùðé äåîîå åôãééï òåã àéðï çåæøéï ìëîåú ùäéå ìäéòùåú ùðé

(a)

(R. Ba/ R. Chiya citing R. Yochanan): Shelamim that were bought with Ma'aser Sheni money that became blemished and were redeemed; they do not go back and become Ma'aser Sheni.

[ãó èæ òîåã à] øáé æòéøà ø' äéìà úøéäåï áùí ø' éåñé áï çðéðä çã àîø ùìîéí ùì÷çï áëñó îòùø ô÷òä îäï ÷ãåùú îòùø [ãó ëä òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] úøåîä ùì÷çä áëñó îòùø ìà ô÷òä îîðä ÷ãåùú îòùø

(b)

R. Zeira and R. Hila both quoted R. Yosi ben Chanina. One said that if Shelamim were bought with Ma'aser Sheni money, they have lost their Kedushah of Ma'aser Sheni. If Terumah was bought with Ma'aser Sheni money, they have not lost their Kedushah of Ma'aser Sheni.

îùðä ùåáøú. îùéáéï ãáø ùô÷òä îîðå ÷ãåùú îòùø òì ãáø ùìà ô÷òä îîðå ÷ãåùú îòùø.

(c)

Question (our Mishnah):- (How could R. Shimon have responded to the Chachamim (see earlier Bechoros 41(b)), "If it's permitted to buy an animal for use as a Shelamim offering, even though it could bring it to the prohibitions of Pigul, Nosar and Tamei; should we not be lenient with Terumah?'') How could he ask from Shelamim, that lose their Kedushah of Ma'aser Sheni, to Terumah where they do not lose their Kedushah (so there's more of a concern that they will become disqualified)...?

åçøðà àîø ìéú äãà (àîøä)[úáøà] îùéáéï ãáø ùô÷òä îîðå (÷ãåùúå)[÷ãåùú îòùø] òì ãáø ùìà ô÷òä îîðå ÷ãåùúå ùäåà àåîø ìå òáø òì èáéìä àçú:

(d)

Rebuttal: The other one said (either R. Zeira or R. Hila, who cited R. Yosi ben Chanina) that there's no question from the Mishnah against R. Yosi ben Chanina - if they were lenient to permit buying Shelamim with Maaser money even though the Kedushah (of Ma'aser Sheni) will be lost; certainly they would permit buying Terumah using Ma'aser Sheni money that does not lose its Kedushah!