We may infer that they both hold that whatever is written in the Parshas Miluim is Me'akev (aligning with one side in the Machlokes below).

There is a Machklokes whether all details of the Miluim are Me'akev, or only those details which are normally Me'akev.

We may conclude that R. Yochanan is of the opinion that all the details are Me'akev.

This is based on the question which Resh Lakish asked on R. Yochanan (that if Perishah is learned from Miluim then it should be Me'akev by Yom ha'Kipurim, as well).

R. Yochanan, by not responding, showed his agreement.

Question: Of what (Halachic) difference is their dispute?

Answer #1: Semichah.

Question: How do we know that Semichah is normally not Me'akev?

Answer: From a Beraisa which speaks of Semichah as the Kaparah of the Korban, but in the end teaches that its absence does not prevent the Kaparah.

Answer #2: Tenufah (same Q&A sequence follows as above).

Answer #3: Perishas Shiv'a.

Question: Whence that Perishah is normally not Me'akev?

Answer: Because the substitute Kohen is not segregated.

Answer #4: Ribui Begadim and Meshichah during the seven days.

Question: Whence that these are normally not Me'akev?

Answer: The Beraisa learns it from "Asher Yimshach Oso va'Asher Yemalei Es Yado".

Question: Then whence that Meshichas Shivah is even a Mitzvah Lechatchilah?

Answer #1: The Pasuk in Tetzaveh links Meshichah to Ribui Begadim.

Question: What is the reason for saying that all details of the Miluim are Me'akev?

Answer: The word "Kachah" in Parshas Tetzaveh implies Ikuv.

Question: But what about the details in Parshas Tzav where the word "Kachah" does not appear?

Answer #1: A Gezeirah Shavah connects the two Parshios.

Answer #2: "Mishmeres" in Parshas Tzav implies Ikuv.

Answer #3: "Ki Chen Tziveisi" means that it is all l'Ikuva.

The Beraisa explores the meaning of the repetition of "Tziveisi, Tziveisi" and "Tzivah Hash-m".

The first, that the Korban should be eaten ba'Aninus; the second was the (erroneous) ruling in this case; the third was to indicate that this ruling is not in error, but rather the commandof Hash-m.

The Michnasayim and Asiris ha'Eifah are not written in the Parshah, but are included with a D'rashah.

Question: Unlike the Michnasayim, Asiris ha'Eifah is not written here at all, so where do we learn it as an obligation during the Miluim

Answer: Gezeirah Shavah from "Zeh Zeh".

Question: Whence that even reading the Parshah is Me'akev?

Answer: "ha'Davar Asher Tzivah Hash-m".

Question: In what order did Moshe dress Aharon and his sons?

Answer: Whatever was, was!

Question: But how will the Kohanim be dressed?

Answer: In the days to come we will see how Moshe dresses Aharon!!

Question: We wish to know the order to understand the Pasuk.

The Pesukim seem to contradict, were they dressed together or separately?

It is a dispute whether he dressed Aharon first or both together.

(Abaye): The dispute is only regarding the Avnet.