שבת, פרשת ויחי
Zevachim 111
(Click 'Read More' to display or hide text)
- Summary of the Daf
- The Tana Kama says that if one pours three Lugin of wine outside the Azarah, he is liable. Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon says that one is liable only if the wine was sanctified in a utensil.
Read More
- Rebbi says that Nesachim were not required on a Bamah Ketanah. The Chachamim disagree.
Read More
- Rebbi Nechemyah says that if one offers, outside the Azarah, the blood that remains after the Zerikas ha'Dam of a Chatas ha'Penimis, he is liable. Rebbi Akiva disagrees.
Read More
- If Melikah was done to a Korban ha'Of inside the Azarah and then one offered it outside the Azarah, he is liable. If the Melikah was done outside the Azarah, there is a disagreement about whether one is liable for offering it outside the Azarah.
Read More
- One who slaughtered a Korban ha'Of inside the Azarah and offered it outside the Azarah is not liable. If he slaughtered it outside the Azarah, he is liable.
Read More
- Ze'iri says that if the Shechitah of a Korban is done at night inside the Azarah, there is a disagreement about whether one is liable for offering it outside the Azarah. However, if the Shechitah is done outside the Azarah at night, everyone agrees that one is liable.
Read More
- Rava says that if the blood of a Korban is received in a non-sanctified utensil inside the Azarah, there is a disagreement about whether one is liable for offering it outside the Azarah. If the blood is received outside the Azarah in a non-sanctified utensil, everyone agrees that one is liable.
Read More
- If the blood of a Chatas was received in a utensil and offered outside the Azarah and then it was offered on the Mizbe'ach or vice versa, one is liable.
Read More
- If the blood of a Chatas was received in two utensils, and the blood from one utensil is offered inside the Azarah and the blood from the other utensil is offered outside the Azarah, one is not liable.
Read More
- If the blood from one utensil is offered outside the Azarah, and the blood from the second utensil is offered inside the Azarah, one is liable, but he fulfills his obligation with the Korban.
Read More
- A Korban Chatas became lost, and the owner designated another animal as a Chatas in its place. The first Chatas was then found. If one Chatas was slaughtered inside the Azarah and the second Chatas was slaughtered outside the Azarah, there is no Chiyuv.
Read More
- If one Chatas was slaughtered outside the Azarah and the second Chatas was slaughtered inside the Azarah, there is a Chiyuv. The owner fulfills his obligation with the Chatas that was offered inside the Azarah.
Read More
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~