(Reish Lakish): Our Mishnah discusses when he was Mekadesh her on condition and entered her (made Nisu'in) Stam, but if he was Mekadesh her Stam and entered her Stam, she has a Kesuvah.

(R. Yochanan): Even if he was Mekadesh her Stam and entered her Stam, she has no Kesuvah.

(R. Chiya citing R. Yochanan): She needs a Get, even if he was Mekadesh her on condition and entered her Stam.

Question (R. Ze'ira, to R. Mana): If he was Mekadesh her Stam and divorced her from Eirusin, what would Reish Lakish say?

Answer: We learn from [the coming Mishnah]. If she had Mumim in her father's house, the father must bring a proof [that they arose after Eirusin, in order to collect a Kesuvah];

Inference: If her father did not bring a proof, she does not have a Kesuvah.

Question: Why do you say that the case is, he was Mekadesh her Stam and divorced her from Eirusin?

Answer: We learn from the Seifa. It says 'when is this? It is regarding Mumim in a covered place, but Mumim in an exposed place, he cannot claim';

If he stipulated, he could claim even for Mumim in an exposed place!

Question (Talmidim in the name of R. Yosi): The Seifa argues with Reish Lakish!

(Seifa): If she entered the husband's Reshus and Mumim were found, the husband must bring a proof [that they came before Kidushin to be exempt from paying a Kesuvah];

Inference: If he brought a proof, she does not have a Kesuvah! How did Reish Lakish say that she has a Kesuvah [when he was Mekadesh her Stam and entered her Stam]?!

Answer (R. Kohen citing Rabanan of Kisarin): Our Mishnah discusses when he entered (had Nisu'in) and did not have Bi'ah. Reish Lakish discusses when he entered and had Bi'ah. I say that he was appeased through Bi'ah.