(Mishnah): [What was caught in] traps for Chayos, birds... [theft applies to it, for the sake of Shalom].

Limitation: This refers to big [traps], but small ones [are considered Kelim, and the one who set them acquires through them]. It is as if [what was caught] is in his house! (All agree that it is absolute theft.)

(Mishnah): If an Oni knocked down olives from a tree, theft applies to them for the sake of Shalom. R. Yosi says, this is absolute theft!

Limitation: This refers to what is on the ground, but if he took (detached) them in his hand (and then cast them down), his hand acquired for him (all agree that it is absolute theft - TOSFOS 61a).

We do not object to poor Nochrim who take Leket, Shichechah and Pe'ah (agricultural gifts left for the poor), for the sake of Shalom.

(Beraisa): A city in which there are Nochrim and Yisraelim, we establish a Gabai (overseer of Tzedakah) for Nochrim, and a Gabai for Yisrael. We collect from Nochrim and Yisraelim, we finance [poor] Nochrim and Yisraelim, we are Mevaker (investigate the needs of) sick Nochrim and Yisraelim, we bury dead Nochrim and Yisraelim, we console bereaved Nochrim and Yisraelim, and we gather Kelim (prone to be lost) of Nochrim and Yisraelim, for the sake of Shalom.

Question (people of Girad, to R. Imi): On the festive day of Nochrim [may one be Mevaker them - PNEI MOSHE]?

Answer #1: R. Imi thought to permit due to this reason, for the sake of Shalom.

Rebuttal (and Answer #2 - R. Aba): R. Chiyah taught that the festive day of Nochrim is forbidden.

R. Imi: If not for R. Aba, we would have permitted [causing Nochrim to thank] their idolatry! Blessed is he, who separated us from them!

(Mishnah): If Leah is suspected to transgress Shemitah, Sarah may lend to her a sifter, grinder or oven, but she may not sift or grind with her;

Sarah, the wife of a Chaver (a trustworthy man, regarding tithes or Taharah) may lend to Leah (a commoner's wife) a sifter, and she may sift and grind with her. Once she adds water (e.g. to knead), Sarah may not help, for we do not assist transgressors;

All of these [Heterim] were said only for the sake of Shalom.

We encourage Nochrim [working] in Shemitah, but not Yisre'elim, and we ask their 'Shalom', for the sake of Shalom.

(Gemara) Question (R. Ze'ira, to R. Mana): Does our Mishnah discuss [lending] Stam, but if she specifies [that she will use them for food], no?

Answer (R. Mana): (There is no difference.) Is not Stam as if she specifies?!

Rebuttal (R. Ze'ira): (No!) I can say that [she borrows] a sifter in order to count coins, or a sieve in order to sieve sand, a mill to grind ingredients, and an oven to insulate bundles of combed flax.

Note: R. SHLOMO SIRILIYO (Shevi'is 5:4) says that the ingredients are for dye. Even though they get Kedushas Shemitah, there is no Isur after Bi'ur.

Question (R. Pinchas): Did they fine [to forbid helping] in a place where people [are suspected to] seed [in Shemitah] and [where they are suspected to] eat [after Zman Bi'ur], or [only] in a place where they [are suspected to] seed, but not where [they are suspected only to] eat?

Question: What is the difference between them?

Answer: If they saw someone buy from a [Yishmaeli] merchant;

If you will say [that they fine] in a place where people seed or eat, one who buys from a merchant, it is forbidden [to help him]. If you will say in a place where they seed, but not where they [only] eat, it is permitted. (We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)

Question (R. Yosi bei R. Chaninah): [Our Mishnah is also at the end of Perek 5 of Shevi'is. Does 'all of these were said only for the sake of Shalom' apply] to the entire Perek, or only to this Halachah (Mishnah)?

Answer (Rabanan of Kisarin citing R. Yehudah ben Titas): Since [here] in Gitin we taught only this Halachah [amidst everything in that Perek, and here we teach all enactments for the sake of Shalom], this shows that it was said only about this Halachah.

Question (Mishnah): A baker who works b'Tum'ah, we do not knead or arrange [loaves] with him (for one must separate Chalah b'Taharah);

And a Beraisa taught about this, we do not select or grind with him, and here [our Mishnah] says so (she may sift and grind with her)?!

Answer #1 (R. Ila): Here (our Mishnah) discusses Chulin. Here (the Beraisa) discusses Terumah.

Objection: The Mishnah [which the Beraisa modifies] discusses a baker. Can you say that a baker [sells] Terumah?!

Answer #2 (Talmidim): Here (the Beraisa) discusses one who is Loses (wet the grain, so it was Huchshar to receive Tum'ah. Here (our Mishnah) discusses one who is not Loses.

Support (for Talmidim - Mishnah): However, from when she puts water, she may not touch (for then it is Huchshar).