LAWS OF GRAIN THAT DID NOT GROW A THIRD (Yerushalmi Chalah Perek 1 Halachah 3 Daf 6b)
åúáåàä ùìà äáéàä ùìéù:
(Mishnah): And grain that did not grow a third.
îä èòîà ãøáðéï
Question: What is the reason for Rabanan (who obligate in Chalah)?
ðàîø ìçí áôñç åðàîø ìçí áçìä îä ìçí äðàîø áôñç ãáø ùäåà áà ìéãé îöä åçîõ àó ìçí ùðàîø áçìä ãáø ùäåà áà ìéãé îöä åçîõ.
Answer: It says "Lechem [Oni]" about Pesach, and it says "Lechem" about Chalah. Just like Lechem said about Pesach is something that comes to Matzah or Chametz, also Lechem said about Chalah is something that comes to Matzah or Chametz.
î"è ãøáé ìòæø
Question: What is the reason for R. Lazar (who exempts)?
[áîãáø èå ë] ëúøåîú âåøï ëï úøéîå àåúä. îä úøåîú âåøï îôéøåú ùäáéàå ùìéù àó æå îôéøåú ùäáéàå ùìéù.
Answer: It says "ki'Serumas Goren Ken Tarimu Osah" - just like Terumas Goren (Terumah Gedolah) is from Peros that grew a third, also this (Chalah) is from Peros that grew a third.
[ãó éà òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] åìéú ìé' ìøáé ìòæø ìçí ìçí.
Question: Does R. Lazar not have [the Gezeirah Shavah] "Lechem-Lechem"?
àùëç úðé áùí øáé ìòæø àéðä çééáú áçìä åàéï àãí éåöà áä é"ç áôñç.
Answer: A Beraisa was found in the name of R. Lazar, [that grain that did not grow a third] is not obligated in Chalah, and one is not Yotzei with it on Pesach. (He equates them due to the Gezeirah Shavah.)
îäå ùçééáé' òì (ìçí) [ö"ì ÷ìé - âìéåðé äù"ñ] ùìå îùåí çãù
Question: [Grain that did not grow a third -] is one liable for its Kali due to Chadash?
à"ø éåãï ëúéá [åé÷øà ëâ éã] åìçí å÷ìé åëøîì ìà úàëìå. àú ùçééáé' òì (÷ìé) [ö"ì ìçí - âìéåðé äù"ñ] ùìå îùåí çãù çééáéí òì (ìçí) [ö"ì ÷ìé - âìéåðé äù"ñ] ùìå îùåí çãù àú ùàéï çééáéï òì (÷ìé) [ö"ì ìçí - âìéåðé äù"ñ] ùìå îùåí çãù àéï çééáéï òì (ìçí) [ö"ì ÷ìé - âìéåðé äù"ñ] ùìå îùåí çãù.
Answer (R. Yudan): It says "v'Lechem v'Kali v'Charmel Lo Sochlu" - what we are liable for its bread due to Chadash, we are liable for its Kali due to Chadash. What we are not liable for its bread due to Chadash, we are not liable for its Kali due to Chadash. (We explained this like GILYONEI HA'SHAS, SEFER NIR. He says that the question was according to R. Lazar. Perhaps it was also according to Rabanan, and we conclude that one is liable for Kali only if one is liable for its bread, i.e. only according to Rabanan, who say that its bread is called Lechem. - PF)
à"ø æòéøà ëúéá [ãáøéí éã ëá] òùø úòùø àú ëì úáåàú æøòê ãáø ùäåà ðæøò åîöîéç éöà ôçåú îùìéù ùàí ðæøò àéðå îöîéç.
(R. Ze'ira): It says "Aser Te'aser Es Kol Tevu'as Zar'echa" - [one must tithe] something that is seeded and sprouts. This excludes [what grew] less than a third. If it is seeded, it does not sprout.
ôùéèà òì ãøáðéï áääï ôçåú îùìéù ùàéðå ðâøø ìòðééï äîòùøåú.
Obviously, according to Rabanan, [what grew] less than a third, it is not Nigrar for Ma'aser (if it is mixed with what grew a third, it does not become obligated in Ma'aseros).
øáé çééà áø éåñó ùàì òì ãòúéä ãøáé ìòæø îäå ùéäà ðâøø ìòðééï çìä ëòéñú äàåøæ.
Question (R. Chiya bar Yosef): According to R. Lazar, is [what grew less than a third] Nigrar for Chalah, like a dough of rice [and wheat? The rice is Nigrar, and joins to obligate it in Chalah.]