Mark Bergman asked:
The Gemoro proves that the 2nd set of daughters can only contain 2
daughters; Rashi explains that we are referring to the case where the father said he had married off "Gedolah".
I presume the reverse would apply, that if he married off "Ketanah", the
Mishna speaks in a case where the FIRST set of daughters only contains 2 daughters. (In which case the 2 parts of the Mishna speak in different cases).
Do you agree?
The Kollel replies:
Who am I to disagree when the Ritva and the Ramban agree. They say that the Gemara could have asked from the other case and just chose one.
D. Zupnik