IN WHOSE RESHUS IS ONE LIABLE? (Yerushalmi Perek 1 Halachah 2 Daf 5b)
ôéñ÷à. ðëñéí ùäï ùì áðé áøéú.
(Mishnah): Property of Bnei Bris.
ôøè ìùåø éùøàì ùðâç ìùåø ùì òëå''í.
This excludes a Yisrael's ox that gored a Nochri's ox.
îðëñéï äîéåçãéï.
(Mishnah): Distinctive property.
åìà îðëñé äô÷ø
This excludes Hefker.
çåõ îøùåú äîéåçãú ìîæé÷
(Mishnah): Except for premises exclusively to the damager.
ùäåà ôèåø ðåäâéï äï áøùåú äðéæ÷ åäîæé÷.
There he is exempt, but [payment for damage] applies in [joint] premises of the victim and the damager.
à''ø éøîéä àéìå úðà çåõ îøùåú äîéåçãú ìîæé÷ åùú÷ äééúé àåîø àçã çöø ùì ùåúôéï åàçã çöø ùàéðä ìùðéäï çééáú. åìîä úðà ðåäâéï äï áøùåú äðéæ÷ åäîæé÷.
Question (R. Yirmeyah): Had the Tana taught 'except for premises exclusively to the damager' and no more, I would have said that the same applies to a joint Chatzer [of the damager and victim], and a Chatzer that is not of both of them - he is liable. Why did the Tana say [that payment for damage] applies in the premises of the victim and the damager?
àìà æä ùåîø çðí åäùåàì ðåùà ùëø åäùåëø.
Answer: Rather, this refers to a Shomer Chinam, borrower, Shomer Sachar and a renter.
à''ø éåñé îëéåï ãúðà çåõ îøùåú äîéåçãú ìîæé÷ àéï àðå éåãòéï ùäï ðåäâéï áøùåú äðéæ÷ åäîæé÷. åìîä úðà ðåäâéï äï áøùåú ðéæ÷ åäîæé÷
Question (R. Yosi): Since the Tana taught 'except for premises exclusively to the damager', don't we know that it applies in the premises of the victim and the damager? Why did he teach 'it applies in the premises of the victim and the damager'?
àìà ìäåöéà çöø ùàéðä ùì ùðéäï.
Answer: Rather, this excludes a Chatzer that is not of both of them (rather, of a third party).