ZEVACHIM 20 (18 Iyar) - dedicated by Avi and Lily Berger of Queens, N.Y., in memory of Lily's father, Mr. Benny Krieger (Chananel Benayahu ben Harav Yisrael Avraham Aba), zt"l, who passed away on Lag ba'Omer 5763. Mr. Krieger exemplified Ahavas Chesed, Ahavas Torah and Ahavas Eretz Yisrael.

1)

TOSFOS DH Meisivei Ra'uhu Echav ha'Kohanim

úåñôåú ã"ä îéúéáé øàåäå àçéå äëäðéí ëå'

(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains how the Makshan understood.)

ìîàé ãñ''ã ãìà îééøé áëäðé çãúé éù úéîä ãìà ôøéê îøéùà ãúðé ÷éãåù áúåøí àú äãùï

(a)

Question: According to the Havah Amina that we do not discuss new Kohanim, this is astounding that we do not ask from the Reisha, which taught Kidush of one who does Terumas ha'Deshen!

åéù ìåîø ãôùéèà ãääåà ãúøåîú äãùï äåé áëäðé çãúé

(b)

Answer: It is obvious that the case of Terumas ha'Deshen refers to new Kohanim.

å÷öú ÷ùä ãàîàé ñ''ã ãìà äåå çãúé ãáîúðéúéï ãúîéã (ãó ìâ.) îùîò ãëåìäå äåå çãúé ùäòæøä äéúä ððòìú åäí äéå áàéï îî÷åí ùäéå éùðéí ùí ááéú äîå÷ã

(c)

Question: What was the Havah Amina that [the Seifa] does not discuss new [Kohanim]? Our Mishnah in Tamid (33a) connotes that all of them were new, for the Azarah was locked and they came from where they were sleeping in Beis ha'Mokad!

[äâ''ä åéù ìåîø ãñì÷à ãòúéä ãîàï ãìà ôñéì áìéðä ìà ôñéì áäéñç äãòú åîàï ãôñéì áäàé ôñéì áäàé

(d)

Comment - Answer: One might have thought that the one who does not disqualify due to Linah, he does not disqualify due to Hesech Da'as, and the one who disqualifies for this, disqualifies for this;

åäðé ëäðé äåä ìäå äéñç äãòú ùäéå éùðéí ááéú äîå÷ã. ò''ë äâ''ä]:

1.

These Kohanim had Hesech Da'as, since they were sleeping in Beis ha'Mokad. Until here is a comment.

20b----------------------------------------20b

2)

TOSFOS DH Yetzi'ah Mahu she'To'il b'Kidush Yadayim v'Raglayim

úåñôåú ã"ä éöéàä îäå ùúåòéì á÷éãåù éãéí åøâìéí

(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses whether Yotzei applies to Kodshim after Kidush Kli.)

ôéøù á÷åðèøñ ëãøê ùôåñìú áëì ä÷ãùéí ù÷ãùå áëìé ùàí éöàå ðôñìéï áéåöà

(a)

Explanation (Rashi): [We ask whether Yetzi'ah disqualifies Kidush] like it disqualifies all Kodshim that became Kodesh in a Kli, that if they left [the Azarah], they are Pasul due to Yotzei.

åàé àôùø ìåîø ëï àìà ëãîôøù èòîà îùåí ãëéåï ãôøéù àñåçé îñç ãòúéä îéðéä åñ"ã ãîàï ãìà ôñéì áìéðä ôñéì áäéñç ä ãòú (äâäú öàï ÷ãùéí)

(b)

Rebuttal: You cannot say so. Rather, it is like [the Gemara] explains the reason. Since he separated (left the Azarah), he diverted his mind from [Avodah]. We are thinking that the one who does not disqualify due to Linah, he disqualifies due to Hesech Da'as.

àáì (äâäú öàï ÷ãùéí) ãîùåí ÷éãåù ëìé ìà îéôñì áéåöà áîéãé ùìà ðòùä áå òáåãä òãééï ëãîåëç áô''÷ ãîðçåú (ãó è.) (äâää áâìéåï)

1.

However, due to Kidush in a Kli, [Kodshim] are not disqualified through Yotzei for something with which Avodah was not yet done, like is proven in Menachos (9a);

ãàîø áììä çåõ ìçåîú äòæøä øáé éåçðï àîø ôñåìä åøéù ì÷éù àîø ëùøä

2.

It says that if he mixed [the flour and oil] outside the wall of the Azarah, R. Yochanan disqualifies and Reish Lakish is Machshir;

àìîà ìøáé éåçðï ìà ôñéì àìà îùåí (äâäú ùéèä î÷åáöú) òáåãä áçåõ àáì îùåí éöéàä ìà

i.

Inference: R. Yochanan disqualifies only due to Avodah outside, but not due to Yetzi'ah.

[åëï îùîò] áôø÷ äúëìú (ùí îæ.) âáé ùúé äìçí ãìà ÷ãåù ìéôñì áéåöà àìà áùçéèú äæáç àò''â ãëáø ðú÷ãù áëìé

(c)

Support #1: It connotes like this also in Menachos (47a) regarding Shtei ha'Lechem. It becomes Kodesh, to be disqualified through Yotzei, only through Shechitah of the Zevach (Shalmei Tzibur), even though it already became Kodesh in a Kli;

ãøáé ñáéøà ìéä ãúðåø î÷ãù áôø÷ øáé éùîòàì (ùí òá:)

1.

Rebbi holds that the oven is Mekadesh in Menachos (72b).

åîéäå éù ìãçåú ãáàéï òí äæáç ùàðé ãäà ðñëéí äáàéï òí äæáç ìà îéôñìé áìéðä ëé àí áùçéèú äæáç ëãàîø æòéøé áôø÷ äúåãä (ùí òè.)

(d)

Rebuttal: We can reject this. What comes with the Zevach is different, for Nesachim that come with the Zevach are disqualified through Linah only [after] Shechitah of the Zevach, like Ze'iri said there (79a);

åàéìå áàéï áôðé òöîï úðï ÷ãùå áëìé ðôñìéï áìéðä

1.

Whereas [Menachos] that come by themselves, a Mishnah teaches that if they were Hukdash in a Kli, they are disqualified through Linah.

åéù òåã øàéä îäà ãúðï áîòéìä ôø÷ á' (ãó è.) âáé îðçåú åùúé äìçí ÷øîå áúðåø äåëùøå ìéôñì áîçåñø ëéôåøéí åáìéðä àáì éåöà ìà ÷úðé

(e)

Support #2: Also, a Mishnah in Me'ilah (9a) teaches that if Menachos or Shtei ha'Lechem formed a crust in the oven, they are Huchshar to become Pasul through a Mechusar Kipurim or Linah. It does not list Yotzei!

åàò''â ãâáé òåôåú åæáçéí äåä îöé ìîéúðé éåöà

1.

Implied question: Regarding birds and Zevachim it could have taught [that they are disqualified also through] Yotzei!

àâá àçøéí ìà úðé àâá ùúé äìçí åìçí äôðéí åîðçåú

2.

Answer: Due to others it did not teach [Yotzei, i.e.] due to Shtei ha'Lechem and Lechem ha'Panim and Menachos.

åäà ãàîø áôø÷ ëì ùòä (ôñçéí ìå.) âáé ìéùä ãîðçåú ðäé ãáæøéæéï ìéúà áî÷åí æøéæéï àéúà

(f)

Implied question: It says in Pesachim (36a) about kneading Menachos "granted, it is not done through zealous people (Kohanim), but it is done in a place of zealous people" (i.e. it must be kneaded in the Azarah)!

àåøçà ãîéìúà ð÷è ùãøê ìòùåúí áî÷åí æøéæéï

(g)

Answer: It discusses the normal case. It is normally done in a place of zealous people.

åäà ãàîø ôø÷ äîæáç î÷ãù (ì÷îï ôç.) ëìé ùøú àéï î÷ãùéï ìé÷øá àáì î÷ãùéï ìéôñì

(h)

Implied question: It says below (88a) that a Kli Shares is not Mekadesh to cause something to be offered, but it is Mekadesh to be disqualified!

äééðå áèáåì éåí åáîçåñø ëéôåøéí åáìéðä àáì ìà áéåöà

(i)

Answer: [It is disqualified] through a Tevul Yom, Mechusar Kipurim or through Linah, but not through Yotzei!

åö''ò îä ùôéøù á÷åðèøñ ô' ùúé îãåú (îðçåú ôæ:) âáé ùìçï àáì î÷ãù (ëï ðøàä ìäâéä) ìéôñì áìéðä åáéåöà

(j)

Question: This requires investigation, what Rashi explained in Menachos (87b) regarding the Shulchan "but it is Mekadesh to become disqualified through Linah or Yotzei";

åì÷îï áñåó äîæáç î÷ãù (ãó ôç.) ôéøù á÷åðè' àáì î÷ãùéï ìéôñì áéåöà àí éöà çåõ ì÷ìòéí àå ðâò áå èáåì éåí

1.

And [also it is difficult what] Rashi explained below (88a), [that Klei Shares] are Mekadesh [Kodesh] to be disqualified through Yotzei if it went outside the curtains (the Azarah), or if a Tevul Yom touched it.

åäà ãàîø ôø÷ ùúé äìçí (îðçåú öä:) [à' ùúé äìçí åà'] ìçí äôðéí ìéùúï åòøéëúï áçåõ àìîà îãú éáù ìà ðú÷ãùä

(k)

Implied question #1: It says in Menachos (95b) "the same law applies to Shtei ha'Lechem and Lechem ha'Panim. Kneading and arranging [making loaves] may be done outside [the Azarah]. This shows that dry measures did not become Kodesh." (I.e. if they were Kodesh, the Pesul of Yotzei would apply!)

åëï áñåó ëì äîðçåú áàåú îöä (ùí ñâ.) ãøéù ø''ù úðåø úðåø ùúé ôòîéí ùúäà àôééúï áúðåø åùéäà ä÷ãùï áúðåø

(l)

Implied question #2: In Menachos (63a), R. Shimon expounded that it says "Tanur" twice, to teach that [Minchas Ma'afe Tanur] must be baked in an oven and made Hekdesh in an oven;

åôøéê åäúðï ø''ù àåîø ìòåìí äåé øâéì ìåîø ùúé äìçí åìçí äôðéí ëùøåú áòæøä åëùéøåú ááéú ôàâé

1.

It asks that R. Shimon says that one should say that Shtei ha'Lechem and Lechem ha'Panim are Kosher whether [they were baked] in the Azarah, or in Beis Pagi. (I.e. the oven is never Mekadesh. If it were, they would be disqualified due to Yotzei!)

ìàå îùåí ãàé ðú÷ãùä äåä îéôñìà áéåöà àìà îùåí ããáø îëåòø ìäåöéà ìçåõ ìàçø ùðú÷ãùä

(m)

Answer: This is not because if it became Kodesh it would be disqualified due to Yotzei. Rather, it is repulsive to take it outside after it became Kodesh.

åàí úàîø åëéåï ãá÷ãåùú ëìé ìà îéôñìà áéåöà îðçú ëäðéí åçáéúé ë''â ãìéú áäå ÷îéöä àéîúé îéôñìé áéåöà

(n)

Question: Since it is not disqualified due to Yotzei [even] through Kedushas Kli, Minchas Kohanim and Chavitei Kohen Gadol, for which there is no Kemitzah, from when are they disqualified due to Yotzei?

åùîà áàåúï îåòéì ÷éãåù ëìé

(o)

Answer: Perhaps for them, Kidush Kli helps. (Shitah Mekubetzes - we find like this in Me'ilah (10a). Something without Matirin, Kidush Kli helps for it, to enable one to be liable for it for Nosar and Tamei.)

åîäàé èòîà éúëï ôé' ä÷åðè' ãäëà

(p)

Defense (of Rashi's Explanation): For this reason, Rashi's Perush here is feasible.

3)

TOSFOS DH Kidesh bi'Chli Shares b'Chutz v'Chulei

úåñôåú ã"ä ÷éãù áëìé ùøú áçåõ ëå'

(SUMMARY: Tosfos infers that Yotzei does not disqualify the water, and explains why.)

úéîä ãîùîò äà äëðéñ áëìé ùøú áôðéí å÷éãù òáåãúå ëùøä àìîà ìà îéôñìà áéöéàú äîéí

(a)

Question: Here it connotes that if he entered [the water] in a Kli Shares inside and was Mekadesh, his Avodah is Kosher. This shows that it is not disqualified through the water leaving!

åé''ì ãìà ùééê äñç äãòú áîéí ëîå áéãéí

(b)

Answer #1: Hesech Da'as does not apply to water, the way it applies to hands.

åòåã ãàéï ëìé î÷ãù ìéôñì áéåöà àìà áôðéí ëãîùîò áääéà ãñåëä (ãó ð.)

(c)

Answer #2: Only inside [the Azarah], a Kli is Mekadesh to become Pasul through Yotzei, like it connotes in Sukah (50a);

ãôøéê åðééúé áî÷åãùú

1.

[The Gemara] asks that we should bring [water for Nisuch ha'Mayim to the Azarah] in a Kodesh Kli.

åòåã ëãôéøùðå ãàéï ëìé î÷ãù ìéôñì áéåöà òã ùðòùéú îöååúå åäééðå ä÷éãåù ëîå îðçä òã ùòú ÷îéöä

(d)

Answer #3: Also, this is like we explained that a Kli is not Mekadesh to become Pasul through Yotzei until its Mitzvah is done, i.e. Kidush, like a Minchah [is not Mekudash] until Kemitzah.

åìëï îéáòéà ìéä á÷éãåù éãéí åøâìéí èôé îáîéí

(e)

Support: This is why we ask about Kidush of hands and feet more than about water.

4)

TOSFOS DH Kol ha'Matil Mayim Ba'i Kidush Yadayim v'Raglayim

úåñôåú ã"ä ëì äîèéì îéí áòé ÷éãåù éãéí åøâìéí

(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why we cannot resolve from here the question about Yotzei.)

úéîä ãúéôùåè îäëà ãàéï éöéàä îåòìú ãîùîò äà áçðí ìà ôñìä éöéàä

(a)

Question: We should resolve from here that Yotzei does not help [to disqualify Kidush], for it connotes that if he left for no reason (not to urinate or defecate), leaving does not disqualify!

åé''ì ãåãàé àé ðôé÷ áùòú òáåãä ìà îéôñì áäëé ëéåï ãàéï ùåäà àìà îòè:

(b)

Answer: Surely, if he left at the time of Avodah, he is not disqualified through this, since he delays only a little. (We cannot infer about a long delay.)

OTHER D.A.F. RESOURCES
ON THIS DAF