Seeing as "Vekichesh" and X "mi'Kol asher Yishava alav" in Pasuk 14) are K?lalim and the other details are P?ratim, what is the Torah coming to preclude from the Din of Asham Gezeilis?
Shevu'os, 37b: It precludes whatever is not movable ? Karka and Avadim, who are compared to Karka; and have no intrinsical value ? Sh'taros.
Why does the Pasuk repeat the word "Amiso"?
Sifra: One, is to exempt where he swears on an object of Hekdesh; 1 the other, one that belongs to a Nochri.
What is "ve'Chichesh bah" referring to? What are its implications?
Rashi: It is referring to any one of the five cases 1 mentioned above which he denies and on which he swears falsely.
Bava Kama 105b: It precludes a case where he admits to the basic claim and denites only part of it 2 - or where Reuven claims that Shimon found two oxen of his and he counters that he found only one ? Yerushalmi Gitin, 5:3. 3
Shevu'os: It precludes someone who admits to one of two partners or two brothers. 4
Yerushalmi Shevu'os, 5:1: It implies "Ve'kichesh bah", 've'Lo Bo' ? where Shimon admits to having found the article but denies having known that it belonged to Reuven. 5
Where is the Azharah (the warning Pasuk - which every punishment requires)?
Rashi (in Kedoshim, Vayikra 19:11): The Azharah appears in the Pasuk there "ve'Lo Sechachashu ve'Lo Seshakru Ish ba'Amiso".
