(Mishnah): Even though the damager pays the victim, he must ask the victim for forgiveness - "return his (Avraham's) wife to him (and he will pray for you), for he is a Navi.''

If he does not forgive, he is cruel - "Avraham prayed to Hash-m... [and He cured Avimelech].''

(Gemara - Beraisa - R. Yehudah citing R. Gamliel): It says "v'Nasan Lecha Rachamim...'' - you have this Siman. As long as you are merciful, Hash-m has mercy on you. If you are not merciful, Hash-m does not have mercy on you.

(Rav): If a person sinned against his friend, and asked [forgiveness] from him, and he did not accept him (consent), he should make a Shurah (row) of people to appease him - "Yashor Al Anashim...''

If he does so, what does it say there? "Padah Nafsho me'Avor ba'Shachas...'' (he redeemed himself from Gehinom).

(R. Yosah): [Our Mishnah teaches that one must forgive] when he did not give to him a bad reputation, but if he gave to him a bad reputation, he never [needs to] forgive him.

(Mishnah): If one said 'blind my eye', 'cut off my hand', (or) 'break my foot' [and he did so], he is liable. [Even if he said] 'on condition to be exempt', he is liable.

If he said 'tear my garment' or 'break my jug', and he did so, he is liable. If he said 'on condition to be exempt', he is exempt.

If he told him 'do so to Ploni', [even if he said] 'on condition to be exempt', whether [he said to damage] his body or property, he is liable.

(Gemara - Tosefta): If one said 'blind my eye, for it hurts me', or 'cut off my hand, for it hurts me', he is liable. [Even if he said] 'on condition to be exempt', he is liable.

(R. Lazar): [Our Mishnah discusses] a 'Hen' (yes) that [can mean] 'no'. (The damager said 'on condition that I will be exempt?', and the one who asked him to damage said 'Hen'. Regarding bodily damage, we assume that he meant 'no'. For property damage, we assume that he meant 'yes.') However, if 'Hen' clearly meant 'yes', [in both cases] he is exempt.

R. Lazar's teaching is due to blemish to the family. (It is embarrassing for them if one of the family is mutilated, so if we can explain that he meant 'no', we assume so.)

(Reish Lakish): [Our Mishnah discusses] a 'Hen' (yes) that clearly means 'yes'. However, if 'Hen' [can mean] 'no', he is liable [even for property damage].

Inference: Reish Lakish's teaching shows that we estimate Boshes for relatives. (Even when he sincerely pardons bodily damage, his pardon is invalid, for it embarrasses his family. We explained this like RIDVAZ.)

(Tosefta): If Nochrim forced a Yisrael, and took another's money [deposited with him] in front of him, he is exempt. If he took it and gave it to them, he is liable.

(R. Yosi): This is when [the Nochri] told him 'give to me money' Stam, but if he said 'Ploni's money', even if [the Shomer] took it and gave it to him, he is exempt.