Question: If a gift was written in [the Get], and [the Shali'ach] said b'Fanai Nechtav uv'Fanai Nechtam, since [the husband's] protest is Batel regarding the Get, it is Batel regarding the gift;

Or, since his protest is sustained regarding the gift, it is sustained regarding the Get! (We explained this like RIDVAZ.)

Question: A Mishnah below says that Gitei Nashim and Shichrurei Avadim are the same regarding one who takes a Get [abroad] or brings [from Chutz la'Aretz];

If a gift was written in [the Get Shichrur], and [the Shali'ach] said b'Fanai Nechtav uv'Fanai Nechtam - even though [the master's] protest is Batel regarding the Get, it is sustained regarding the gift;

Or, since his protest is sustained regarding the gift, it is sustained regarding the Get!

Question: If one wrote [to give] all his property to his slave, you say that his Get [Shichrur] is his gift. How do you judge it?

Is it like a Get, and his protest is Batel (if the Shali'ach said b'Fanai Nechtav uv'Fanai Nechtam)? Or, is it like a gift, and is protest is sustained?

Answer: It is like the following. If one wrote all his property to two people at once, and the witnesses were Kosher to this one and Pasul to this one - R. Ila said in the name of R. Ami that R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish argued about this;

One said that since they are Pasul for this, they are Pasul for this. One said that they are Kosher for this and Pasul for this.

R. Mana did not explain [who said the former and who said the latter]. R. Avin explained - R. Yochanan said that since they are Pasul for this, they are Pasul for this. Reish Lakish said that they are Kosher for this and Pasul for this.

Support (for R. Yochanan - R. Elazar - Beraisa): Just like two, if one of them was found to be a relative or Pasul, their testimony is Batel - also three, if one of them was found to be a relative or Pasul, their testimony is Batel.

(R. Yakov bar Acha): R. Chanina the colleague of Rabanan argued about this with Rabanan. One said that R. Lazar said properly. The other said that R. Lazar did not say properly;

The one who said that R. Elazar said properly - it is made like one testimony about one person, and testimony that is partially Batel is totally Batel;

The one who said that R. Elazar did not say properly - it is made like two sets of witnesses. They are Kosher to this [person] and Pasul to this.

[We ask the Shali'ach] until he says b'Fanai Nechtav b'Yom v'Nechtam ba'Yom (it was signed the same day that it was written) b'Fanai Nechtav Lishmah v'Nechtam Lishmah. (We ask also about other matters that can disqualify it - SHIREI KORBAN.)