More Discussions for this daf
1. Kedushah 2. Women wearing Tefilin 3. Baal Keri learning Torah
4. Tosfos DH Shev 5. Time to eat vs. Time to Bentch 6. Question on Rashi regarding Kavod ha'Briyos
7. Children and Mezuzahs 8. Chiyuv d'Rabanan Being Motzi a Chiyuv d'Oraisa 9. Tum'ah of Zera
10. Talmid Chacham 11. Rav Ada bar Ahavah's zealousness 12. Bentching/Shochad
13. Ba'al Keri Meharher 14. One who davens does not need to mention the name; what about Lashon ha'Ra? 15. First Tosafos on Amud Bais
16. Mitzvos Lo Sa'asei she'ha'Zman Grama 17. Rav Yochanan by the Mikva 18. Chinuch for Tefillah
19. Tosfos Divrei Hamaschil Ba'al Keri 20. Women and Tefilin 21. Problems with the Kal v'Chomer
22. Mezuzah
DAF DISCUSSIONS - BERACHOS 20

Mr. Mordechai Perlman asks:

The Gemara considers the possibility that one might be mislead into thinking that Birkas HaMazon is time-related because of a verse mentioning the times of eating. Why would a verse discussing times of eating and not discussing the times of benching lead one to think that bentching is time-related?

Mr. Mordechai Perlman, Jerusalem, Israel

The Kollel replies:

Since the meal times are fixed for the evening and the morning, it follows that in practice the times at which one says Birkas ha'Mazon are also fixed for evening and morning. Since the fixed times for eating automatically lead to fixed times of Birkas ha'Mazon, one might have been mislead into thinking that the Mitzvah of Birkas ha'Mazon is time-related.

Kol Tuv,

Dovid Bloom