Shalom Aleichem Chevrei Kollel HaKadosh
Why do both Rav & Rav Kahana utilize the term "l'chol Tzarchehem"
As opposed to the lashon in the Mishna of "Paying Rent" maalin schar..
According to Rav are their Rishonim that say everything provided to the Rotzeach Beshogeg in the 6 applies to the 42, and according to the 42 is protection only, then anything provided or that we mandate in the 6 applies to the 42?
Weren't the roadways to the 42 also not bound by access and maintenance requirements for traveling like the 6?
Avrahom , United States
Dear Avrahom,
Thank you very much for your excellent questions.
A. Regarding your first question (why the Gemara uses the phrase "l'Chol Tzarcheichem" instead of the Mishnah's phrase, "Ma'alin Lo Sechar"(i.e., paying rent):
The term "Chol Tzarcheichem" is rooted in the wording of the Pasuk itself. The Gemara derives this from "v'Hayu ha'Arim Lachem l'Miklat," where the word "Lachem" appears to be redundant. This teaches that the cities are provided for your benefit -- meaning that the Rotze'ach is entitled to have his needs met there.
The word "Lachem" is thus understood literally: the cities must serve your needs, hence "l'Chol Tzarcheichem." Rent is one clear and basic need, but it is merely a concrete instance of the general principle derived from "Lachem" -- that the cities must accommodate the practical needs of the Rotze'ach.
B. As to your question about whether everything provided in the six Arei Miklat must also be provided in the forty-two additional cities:
It depends what "needs" you are referring to. Aside from rent, I am not aware of additional obligations mentioned explicitly in the Sugya.
However, another significant distinction is whether the city grants protection even if the Rotze'ach is unaware that he has entered it. According to the Gemara (elsewhere) and the Rambam (Hilchos Rotze'ach u'Shemiras ha'Nefesh 8), the six cities provide protection even she'Lo mi'Da'as, while the other forty-two (the regular Arei ha'Leviyim) protect only mi'Da'as.
You asked if any Rishonim discuss this directly. I have not found such a discussion so far, besides this distinction that appears clearly in the Rambam.
C. Regarding your question about the roads to the cities:
The Gemara, and especially the Rambam (Hilchos Rotze'ach u'Shemiras ha'Nefesh 8), describe in detail the obligation to prepare broad, well-marked, and properly maintained roads, and this is stated only regarding the six Arei Miklat, not the additional forty-two.
D. My broader understanding is as follows:
The primary Mitzvah of designating Arei Miklat for the Rotze'ach be'Shogeg is fulfilled specifically through the six cities, three in Ever ha'Yarden and three in Eretz Kena'an, plus three more le'Asid la'Vo.
The additional forty-two Arei ha'Leviyim are auxiliary. They offer refuge, but they are not the core of the Mitzvah. Therefore, many of the obligations that apply to the six (such as signage, road preparation, and perhaps the full scope of communal support) do not apply equally to the forty-two.
The fact that the six cities provide Miklat even she'Lo mi'Da'as (as derived from a Derashah) is not merely technical; it reflects their unique designation. Their very geography provides Miklat, unlike the other cities where intent is required.
This also supports the idea that these six cities are not merely among the Arei ha'Leviyim but are purpose-built for Miklat, which is why the full infrastructure and communal responsibilities apply there.
I hope this clarifies the issue.
Aharon Steiner