1)

TOSFOS DH EISEIVEIHRAV ACHA BAR MINYUMI

úåñ' ã"ä àéúéáéä øá àçà áø îðéåîé

(Summary: Tosfos disagrees with Rashi's explanation and elaborates.)

ôé' á÷åðè' ãìà ôøéê àìà îøéùà 'åäòãéí îòéãéï ... ' åìà îñéôà.

(a)

Explanation #1: Rashi explains that it only asks from the Reisha 've'ha'Eidim Me'idin ... ', but not from the Seifa.

åàéï ðøàä, ãäà øáà î÷ùä ì÷îï áäãéà î'äåãä' ...

(b)

Refutation: But this is not correct, since Rava asks later from 'Hodeh' ...

ãàëúé ìà îçì÷ áéï 'äåãä' ì'òãåú' òã ãîúøõ ì÷îï äëé.

1.

Reason: ... since the Gemara does not yet differentiate between 'Hodeh' and Eidus - until the Gemara specifically answers to that effect later.

åà"ú, à"ë àîàé ìà ôøéê ðîé îñéôà?

(c)

Question: In that case, why does the Gemara not ask also from the Seifa?

åðøàä ãäà åãàé ôùéèà ãìà àîø áèåòï èòðú âðá åðùáò åáàå òãéí ùéäà ôèåø ...

(d)

Answer: It seems to be obvious that the Tana does not say that he will be Patur in a case of To'en Ta'anas Ganav, where he swears and then witnesses arrive ...

ãà"ë, ìà îùëçú ëôì ãëúéá áàåøééúà.

1.

Reason: ... because if he would be, the case where the Torah says that one pays Kefel would never materialize.

àáì áäåãä ñ"ã ãøá ôåèø...

(e)

Answer (cont.): But by 'Hodeh' - where he admits of his own volition, Rav thought that he is Patur ...

åàò"â ãáùáåòä åäåãàä ëúéá "çåîù ... "

1.

Implied Question: ... even though by Shevu'ah and Hoda'ah the Torah writes the Din of 'Chomesh' ...

øá äåä îå÷é ì÷øà á÷ôõ åðùáò, ãçåîù åàùí îçééá àó à'ùáåòú òöîå.

2.

Answer: Rav would establish that where he 'jumped' and swore, seeing as Chomesh and Asham apply even to a Shevu'ah that one made by oneself ...

àáì áðùáò ò"ô á"ã åäåãä, áòé ìîéîø øá ãôèåø...

(f)

Answer (cont.): ... but there where one swore under the auspices of the Beis-Din and then admitted, Rav wants to say that he is Patur ...

ãà'ùáåòú á"ã ëúéá "åì÷ç áòìéå åìà éùìí ".

1.

Reason: ... since it is in connection with the Shevu'ah of the Beis-Din that the Torah writes "And the owner shall accept it and he (the one who swore) need not pay".

2)

TOSFOS DH KA'AN SHE'KAFATZ

úåñ' ã"ä ëàï ù÷ôõ

(Summary: Tosfos queries the Gemara's answer.)

úéîä, àí ëï, àîàé ð÷è áøéùà 'èåòï èòðú àáã' ,àôé' áèåòï èòðú âðá ä"î ìîð÷è...

(a)

Question: In that case, why, in the Reisha, does it present the case of 'To'en Ta'anas Avad'? It could just as well have presented that of 'To'en Ta'anas Ganav' ...

ãìà îçééá ëôì ëéåï ù÷ôõ.

1.

Question (cont.): ... since, seeing as he 'jumped and swore', he is not Chayav Kefel?

3)

TOSFOS DH KAFATZ LO MATZIS AMRAT DE'HISHBI'A ALAV KATANI

úåñ' ã"ä ÷ôõ ìà îöéú àîøú ãäùáéò òìéå ÷úðé

(Summary: Tosfos reconciles this with the Gemara earlier.)

åúéîä, ãìòéì ÷úðé 'îùáéòê àðé' åîå÷é ìä á'÷ôõ' ?

(a)

Question: But earlier the Tana mentioned 'Mashbi'acha Ani', and the Gemara established it where he 'jumped and swore'.?

åéù ìåîø, ã'äùáéò òìéå' îùîò ò"é á"ã, àáì 'îùáéòê àðé' îùîò ù÷ôõ åäùáéòå.

(b)

Answer: 'Hishbi'a alav' implies through the Beis-Din, whereas 'Mashbi'acha Ani' implies that he 'jumped' and made him swear.

106b----------------------------------------106b

4)

TOSFOS DH VE'LISHNI LEIH K'GON SHE'AMAD BA'DIN VE'AMRU LEIH TZEI TEN LO

úåñ' ã"ä åìéùðé ìéä ëâåï ùòîã áãéï åàîøå ìéä öà úï ìå

(Summary: Tosfos amends the wording in the Beraisa accordingly and explains the Dochek.)

åäùúà öøéê ìäåñéó òì äáøééúà åìôøù äëé ' -äéëï ùåøé'? à"ì 'ðâðá.' 'îùáéòê àðé' åàîø 'àîï' ...

(a)

Clarifying Text: One now needs to add to the Beraisa and to explain as follows - 'Where is my ox?' 'It has been stolen'. 'I make you swear that it has'. 'Amen' ...

åàç"ë áàå òãéí åàîøå ùéù áéãå, åòîã áãéï åà"ì 'öà åúï ìå' ...

1.

Clarifying Text (cont.): ... after which witnesses arrived and testified that the ox was still in his possession; so they went to Beis-Din, who ordered him to pay ...

åàç"ë èáçå åäòãéí îòéãéí àåúå ùàëìå, îùìí úùìåîé ëôì

2.

Clarifying Text (cont.): ... following which he Shechted it, and witnesses testified that he ate it; upon which he is Chayav to pay double.

åàó ò"â ãäùúà öøéê ìäåñéó òì äáøééúà åìôøù áãåç÷...

(b)

Implied Question: Even though one is now forced to add to the Beraisa and to explain it with a Dochek ...

ðéçà ìéä ìâîøà ìàå÷îé äëé îìàå÷îé 'ëùàëìå ðáìä' ,ùæä ðøàä ìå ãåç÷ éåúø.

(c)

Answer: ... the Gemara prefers that to establishing it where he ate Neveilah, which it sees as a bigger Dochek still.

5)

TOSFOS DH AVAL ACHLO KE'SHE'HU GADOL MAI HACHI NAMI DE'MISHLAM ETC.

úåñ' ã"ä àáì àëìå ëùäåà âãåì îàé äëé ðîé ãîùìí ëå'

(Summary: Tosfos queries as to why, if witnesses claim that he ate it, he is not initially believed with a 'Migu'.)

îùîò àí ðùáò åáàå òãéí ùàëìå, îùìí úùìåîé ëôì.

(a)

Inference: This implies that if he swore and witnesses testified that he ate it, he will have to pay double.

åúéîä, àîàé áòé ùáåòä îòé÷øà ëùàîø 'ðâðá?' éäà ðàîï áîâå ãàé áòé àîø 'äçæøúéå ìê ëùäééúé ÷èï' ,ãðàîï áìà ùáåòä ,éäà ðîé ìåîø 'ðâðá' áìà ùáåòä?

(b)

Question: Why did he have to swear initially when he claimed that it was stolen? Why is he not believed with a 'Migu', because, since he could have claimed that he returned it whilst he was still a Katan, where he is believed without a Shevu'ah, he should also be believed when he says that it was stolen - without having to swear?

åé"ì, ãäëà îééøé ùèåòï æä ä÷èï ëùäâãéì 'ðúúé ìê ô÷ãåï ëùäééú ÷èï, åéåãò àðé ùéù áéãê òëùéå' ...

(c)

Answer: It speaks here where the Katan after he grew up, claimed that he gave him the Pikadon whilst he was still a Katan, and he knows that he still has it in his possession ...

ãäùúà ìà ùééê ìîéîø îâå ã'äàëìúéå ëùäéä ÷èï' -ãà"ë, äåä ëôø áîä ùàîø ìéä 'òãééï éùðä áéãê,' åàéï æä îâå ...

1.

Reason: ... in which case, he cannot claim that he fed it to him whilst he was still a Katan - because if so, he will be denying the owner's claim that he still has it, in which case it is not a 'Migu'.

ëãàîø ì÷îï ãàéï îòéæ ôðéå ìåîø 'ìäã"í' !.

2.

Source: ... as the Gemara will state later (on Daf 107a) - that a person does not have the gall to say 'Lo Hadam' (Lo Hayah ha'Devarim me'Olam)!' (See Maharsha).

6)

TOSFOS DH HA LO ASI MI'KO'ACH BEN DA'AS

úåñ' ã"ä äà ìà àúé îëç áï ãòú

(Summary: Tosfos clarifies the source of the statement.)

åàìéáà ãøá àùé àéï éëåì ìäùáéò ëìì ëì îä ùäô÷éãå á÷èðåúå, àôéìå äô÷ãåï áòéï.

(a)

Clarification: And according to Rav Ashi he cannot make him swear at all on what he deposited by him when he was a Katan - even if the Pikadon is available ...

àáì ìùéðåéà ÷îà, éëåì ìäùáéòå ëùäåà áòéï.

1.

Clarification cont.): ... but according to the first answer, he can make him swear as long as it is available.