More Discussions for this daf
1. Ladders 2. The Agadeta on Shlomo ha'Melech 3. Tefilas Arvis
4. Pidyon Haben 5. Aruch La'Ner on Pikuach Nefesh 6. 53a Hillel
7. ורבנן מאי טעמייהו
DAF DISCUSSIONS - SUKAH 53

Dov Young asked:

Dear Rabbi Montrose shlita,

I enjoy listening to your shiurim very much. In your shiur on Pidyon Haben, you quoted from the Sefer Ha'aros on Sukkah that Rav Elyashiv shlita ruled in the case you mentioned to recite the brachah with Hash-m's name, however he doubted whether to rely on that or not. I was excited to hear you mention the psak, because I recently remembered that in the Sefer Sefer Aleinu Leshabayach Parshas Vzos Habrachah (on the pasuk "ha'omer li'aviv ilimo lo hikir"), Rav Alyashiv's son-in-law, Harav Yitzchak Zilberstein shlita mentions the same question. Rav Zilberstein suggested your suggestion (to make up a story that the mother may be a bas levi). Rav Zilberstein said over there that he asked his father-in-law what to do in such a case, and he said to say the brachah with Hash-m's name. From there it sounds that that's the best option. Look at the begining of Sefer Ha'aros where the writer cautions that there may be mistakes. I have more to say about the different psakim and a suggestion of the "ikker machloikes" here. Please write back and let me know if you want to hear.

Kol tuv,

Dov Young, Oak Park, Michigan

The Kollel replies:

In He'aros, Rav Elyashiv seems to conclude that it would not be permitted to say the Berachah. It should also be noted that the story of R' Zilberstein and the one in He'aros were clearly two separate incidents, so it could be that R' Elyashiv changed his position. I have more to say on the subject as well, but not in this forum. Please contact me through my website at www.halachicworld.com .

Kol Tuv,

Yaakov Montrose