| (Permission is granted to redistribute this material as long as the Kollel header and the subscription info at the end are included.) |
brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Email - daf@shemayisrael.co.il
_________________________________________________________________
Nidah Chart #1
| (A) CHACHAMIM(1) |
(B) REBBI MEIR |
(C) REBBI DOSA(2) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A WOMAN WITH A VESES(3) |
||||
| 1a) | FINDS BLOOD DURING BEDIKAH | me'Es l'Es(4) | --- | From now on |
| 1b) | FINDS A STAIN | me'Es l'Es | --- | me'Es l'Es |
| THE FOUR WOMEN WHO NORMALLY DO NOT SEE DAM NIDAH |
||||
| 2a) | FINDS BLOOD DURING BEDIKAH | From now on(5) | From now on(5) | From now on(5) |
| 2b) | FINDS A STAIN | --- | me'Es l'Es(6) | From now on(6) |
==========
FOOTNOTES:
==========
(1) The Chachamim who argue with Rebbi Dosa, as recorded in a Beraisa not
quoted by the Gemara (Rashi 4b, DH Rebbi Dosa).
(2) Rebbi Dosa, following the view of Rebbi Chanina ben Antignos.
(3) This refers to a case in which the woman found blood at the *expected*
time. If she finds blood earlier or later, then all agree that she is Tamei
retroactively, me'Es l'Es.
(4) That is, she is Tamei retroactively 24 hours (with regard to all of the
Taharos that she touched).
(5) This is according to Rashi (DH Ha she'Ein). Tosfos (DH Ha), however,
seems to understand that that all of the Tana'im quoted by the Gemara
maintain that the four women are Tamei retroactively me'Es l'Es (see
Rashash).
(6) This applies to all of the cases, except for a girl under the age of
twelve who has never seen blood; she is completely Tahor, even if she finds
a stain.
| Main Nidah Page |
List of Charts and Graphics |
Insights to the Daf |
Background to the Daf |
Review the Daf Questions and Answers |
Point by Point Summary |