REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI

Prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
daf@dafyomi.co.il    http://www.dafyomi.co.il


Previous Daf
YEVAMOS 97
Question Mark
Ask A
Question
1)
(a) How do we reconcile our Mishnah, which equates the Din of a ben Esrim who did not yet bring signs of Gadlus with that of a ben Tesha, and the Beraisa, which states that a ben Esrim needs only to prove that he has reached the age of twenty, and he has the Din of a Saris (who is a Gadol)?
(b) Rava proves this from the last two words of the statement in the Beraisa. What are they?
(c) Up to what age will a person who has neither the signs of a Gadol nor those of a Saris remain a Katan?
(d) What would Rava advise someone to do, if he had reached the age of twenty and the signs of Gadlus had not yet appeared?
click for answer

***** Hadran Alach ha'Ishah Rabah *****


***** Nos'in al ha'Anusah *****

2)
(a) What are the ramifications of the Mishnah 'Nos'in al ha'Anusah?
(b) Is one Chayav for raping one's wife sister, daughter or mother?
(c) The Tana Kama permits a person to marry a woman who was raped by his father or by his son. What does Rebbi Yehudah say?
(d) To whom else will these Halachos apply besides a woman who was raped?
click for answer

3)
(a) How do we reconcile our Mishnah (which permits a man to marry the relatives of a woman whom he raped) with the Beraisa, which forbids him to marry the relatives of the woman whom he purportedly raped?
(b) Then why does our Mishnah say 'Nos'in' (l'Chatchilah)?
(c) What does the Beraisa extrapolate from the fact that, by all the blood-relatives listed in Kedoshim, the Torah uses a Lashon of 'Shechivah', whereas by those relationships that come about through marriage, it uses a Lashon of 'Kichah'?
(d) Rav Papa asked Abaye from Achoso, where the Torah uses the Lashon of 'Kichah'. What did Abaye answer?
click for answer

4)
(a) Rava learns the Din of 'Nos'in al ha'Anusah' from a contradiction between two Pesukim. What does he infer from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos "Ervas bas Bincha O bas Bitcha Lo Segaleh" that clashes with the other Pasuk there "Ervas Ishah u'Vitah Lo Segaleh, es bas Bnah v'es bas Bitah Lo Sikach"?
(b) How does he reconcile the two Pesukim?
(c) How does he know that the reverse is not the case (that rape or seduction will forbid the relatives, but marriage will not)?
click for answer

5)
(a) According to Rav Gidal Amar Rav, Rebbi Yehudah learns from the Pasuk in Ki Setzei "Lo Yikach Ish es Eishes Aviv, v'Lo Yegaleh Kenaf Aviv" that Anusas Aviv is forbidden. How does he know that the Pasuk is speaking about Anusas Aviv (and not a case of marriage, as we shall see shortly)? On which principle is Rebbi Yehudah's interpretation based?
(b) On what grounds do the Rabanan disagree with Rebbi Yehudah's source? What does he do with the principle of Semuchin?
(c) They therefore Darshen the Pasuk like Rav Anan Amar Shmuel. How does he interpret "v'Lo Yegaleh Kenaf Aviv"?
(d) Why do we need a Pasuk for that, seeing as she is anyway Dodaso (his uncle's wife)?
click for answer

6)
(a) Which third Lav do we suggest he might transgress?
(b) How do we reject this suggestion? Why might he only be Chayav two Lavin?
click for answer


97b----------------------------------------97b

7)
(a) What is the point of the series of riddles that Chazal now present?
(b) The first riddle is 'He is my paternal father as well as my mother's husband'. Who is speaking to whom here?
(c) On what grounds does Rami bar Chama state that this does not conform with the opinion of Rebbi Yehudah in our Mishnah?
click for answer

8)
(a) To which case does each of the following statements refer:
1. 'He is my brother and my son. I am the sister of the child whom I carry on my shoulders'?
2. ... 'Good morning to you my son, I am your sister's daughter'?
3. ... 'The child I am carrying on my shoulders is my son and I am his brother's daughter'?
(b) To whom was this riddle addressed?
(c) Why does the first of these cases pertain to a Yisrael and the others to a Nochri?
(d) And who is saying the following about/to whom ...
1. ... 'I lodge a complaint about my (maternal) brother who is my husband as well as the son of both my husband and the husband of my mother. And I am his wife's daughter, who refuses to give a piece of bread to the orphaned children of his daughter?
2. ... 'You and I are brother and sister; your father and I are brother and sister, and your mother and I are sisters?
(e) How is this last case possible even if all those involved are Yisraelim ?
click for answer

9)
(a) On what grounds do the sons of a Nochris who converted together with her, perform neither Yibum nor Chalitzah with each other's wives?
(b) What is the source for this?
(c) What will be the Din if ...
1. ... one of them was conceived before the conversion but born after it, and the other one was both born and conceived after it?
2. ... a Shifchah together with her sons converted in the same circumstances?
click for answer

10)
(a) Rav Acha bar Yakov permitted the sons of Yudan, a Shifchah Meshuchreres, to marry each other's wives. What did he retort when Rava informed him that Rav Sheshes forbade it?
(b) Both Rav Sheshes and Rav Acha bar Yakov agree that paternal (but not maternal) brothers are permitted (as we explained in our Mishnah). In the first Lashon, they also agree that maternal brothers are forbidden. Why is that?
(c) Why did Chazal decree by maternal brothers but not by paternal ones?
click for answer

11)
(a) What, in fact, is the Machlokes between Rav Sheshes and Rav Acha bar Yakov in the first Lashon?
(b) In the second Lashon, Rav Acha bar Yakov is even more lenient. What does he say?
(c) What is his reason? On which principle is his reason based?
click for answer

12)
(a) How does our Mishnah 'ha'Giyores she'Nisgayru Banehah Imah, Lo Choltzin v'Lo Misyabmin' seem to pose a Kashya on the second Lashon of Rav Acha bar Yakov? How do we initially interpret 'Lo Choltzin v'Lo Misyabmin'?
(b) This Kashya is strengthened by the word 'Afilu' ('Afilu Horaso shel Rishon she'Lo bi'Kedushah ... v'ha'Sheni Horaso v'Leidaso bi'Kedushah'). What does 'Afilu imply' in this context?
(c) And what does it imply according to Rav Acha bar Yakov, who permits them in all cases (and who interprets 'Lo Choltzin v'Lo Misyabmin' to mean that Yibum and Chalitzah are not necessary)?
(d) In the second Lashon, we try to prove Rav Acha bar Yakov's opinion from 'Afilu', which implies that even though they were both born bi'Kedushah, they are forbidden. On what grounds do we refute this proof?
click for answer

13)
(a) We query Rav Acha bar Yakov once more from the Beraisa which forbids two twin brother converts to perform either Chalitzah or Yibum with each other's wives. Why does the Tana speak specifically about twins?
(b) Why are they not Chayav because of Eishes Ach (even if they are maternal brothers too)?
(c) How would the Din differ if they were ...
1. ... born after their parents' conversion?
2. ... both conceived and born after the conversion?
(d) On what grounds do we refute the inference from the Reisha of the Beraisa 'Ein Chayavin Mishum Eishes Ach', Chiyuva Leika, Ha Isura Ika (a Kashya on Rav Acha)?
click for answer

Next Daf

Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Yevamos

OTHER D.A.F. RESOURCES ON THIS DAF
Insights
 • 
Background
 • 
Point by Point
Outline
 • 
Halachah
Outlines
 • 
English Charts
& Graphics

Review
Quiz
 • 
Hebrew
Charts
 • 
Yosef
Da'as
 • 
Chidonim
 • 
Galei
Masechta
 • 
Lectures:Iyun
or Archaeology

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page



See the Daf

Sponsorships & Donations  •  Readers' Feedback
Mailing Lists  •  Archives  •  Ask the Kollel
Dafyomi Weblinks  •  Dafyomi Calendar
Chomer b'Ivrit

Hear the Daf