REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI

Prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
daf@dafyomi.co.il    http://www.dafyomi.co.il


Previous Daf
YEVAMOS 95
Question Mark
Ask A
Question
1)
(a) We learn from "Osah" that having relations with a wife's sister does not forbid his wife to him. Seeing as the Torah does not specifically forbid her, why do we need a Pasuk for this? Why would we otherwise have thought that she is forbidden?
(b) According to Rebbi Yehudah, Beis Shamai and Beis Hillel agree that relations with one's mother-in-law forbids his wife to him. They argue over our case (whether he becomes forbidden through relations with his wife's sister). Beis Hillel permit it because of "Osah". What is Beis Shamai's reason?
(c) According to Rebbi Yosi, Beis Shamai and Beis Hillel both agree that relations with one's wife's sister do not forbid her to him. Then what is their Machlokes?
click for answer

2)
(a) In what way does a man who marries a woman forbid his wife more than she forbids him?
(b) How does Rebbi Yosi extrapolate from this that if a man has relations with his wife's sister b'Shogeg, she remains permitted to him?
(c) How does Rebbi Ami Amar Resh Lakish learns Rebbi Yehudah's opinion (that relations with a man's mother-in-law forbids his wife to him) from the Pasuk in Kedoshim "ba'Esh Yisrefu Oso v'Es'hen"?
click for answer

3)
(a) What did Rav Yehudah Amar Shmuel do with that man who had relations with his mother-in-law?
(b) What did he mean when he told him that if not for Shmuel, he would have forbidden him permanently? What did Shmuel say?
click for answer

4)
(a) We learned above that, if not for the Pasuk "Osah", we would have forbidden a woman to her husband on the basis of his having had relations with her sister, from a 'Kal va'Chomer'. Rav Chisda initially learns the 'Kal va'Chomer' from Machzir Gerushaso. What makes Machzor Gerushaso an Isur Kal? To whom is she forbidden?
(b) On what two scores do we reject this 'Kal va'Chomer'? Which two stringencies does Machzor Gerushaso have over Achos Ishto?
(c) So Resh Lakish learns it from a Yevamah. This cannot mean a Yevamah who had relations with someone from the Shuk, for two reasons, one of them, because, unlike Achos Ishto, whereas the wife herself did not sin, here she did (like we just said with regard to Machzir Gerushaso). What other stringency does Yevamah l'Shuk have over Achos Ishto?
click for answer

5)
(a) So we establish the 'Kal va'Chomer' from Yevamah l'Achim. It is obvious that this cannot be referring to a Yevamah who had relations with someone else (like Rav Hamnuna, who forbids her to the brothers). Why not?
(b) What then, must be the case of Yevamah? What makes it an Isur Kal?
(c) How do we get round the problem that, if that was the case, then the second brother would not need to have made Bi'ah with the Yevamah; she would be forbidden to the first brother even if he just made Ma'amar (like the first one did)?
(d) We cannot reject the current suggestion (to learn the 'Kal va'Chomer' from Yevamah l'Achim) from Ma'amar, as we just explained. On what grounds do we nevertheless reject it?
click for answer

6)
(a) Rebbi Yochanan therefore tries to establish the case by Sotah. Why can this not mean a Sotah with whom ...
1. ... the husband had relations?
2. ... the adulterer had relations?
(b) So Rava and Ravin Amar Rebbi Yochanan finally establish the 'Isur Kal' by Eshes Ish. In which respect is Eshes Ish called an Isur Kal?
click for answer


95b----------------------------------------95b

7)
(a) Following the Tana Kama's ruling in our Mishnah (regarding the wife who returned after her husband had married her sister), Rebbi Yosi states 'Kol she'Posel al Yedei Acheirim Posel al Yedei Atzmo (v'Chol she'Ein Posel al Yedei Acherim Ein Posel al Yedei Atzmo)'. What does he mean by that?
(b) How do we know that he does not mean to say the opposite (that just as his own wife is permitted to him, so too, is his brother-in-law permitted to his wife?
(c) Rebbi Yosi concludes 'v'Chol she'Eino Posel al Yedei Acherim, Eino Posel al Yedei Atzmo'. What is he referring to, according to Rebbi Ami? In which case does he agree with the Tana Kama that he is permitted to return to his wife?
click for answer

8)
(a) According to Rebbi Yitzchak Nafcha, Rebbi Yosi refers to the Seifa (to when one witness testified) 'Ha d'Azli Ishto v'Giso, Ha d'Azli Arusaso v'Giso'. What is the difference as to whether his sister and brother-in-law were only betrothed or married?
(b) How does this explain Rebbi Yosi's statement 'v'Chol she'Eino Posel al Yedei Acheirim Eino Posel al Yedei Atzmo'?
(c) And why do the Rabanan disagree with him by one witness, to forbid his brother-in-law to take back his wife even if they were previously married?
click for answer

9)
(a) Rav considers a Yevamah like an Eshes Ish. How does Rav Huna explain this?
(b) Why must Rav be speaking about a woman to whom the brother had been betrothed but had not married?
(c) Shmuel says 'Einah k'Eshes Ish'. Why is that?
(d) Why does Rav Yosef initially think that Shmuel's ruling here clashes with his previous statement, where he ruled like Rebbi Yosi?
click for answer

10)
(a) Abaye gives three possible answers to Rav Yosef's Kashya. How does he answer it by establishing Rebbi Yosi like Rebbi Ami interpreted it?
(b) How will Shmuel then explain the difference between the case of Achos Ishto, where, according to Rebbi Yosi, she is forbidden to return to return to her husband, and that of Eshes Achiv, where she is permitted?
(c) And how does Abaye answer the Kashya even according to Rebbi Yitzchak Nafcha's explanation?
(d) In another alternative, Abaye dismisses Rav Huna's interpretation of the Machlokes between Rav and Shmuel. He suggests that they argue over Rav Hamnuna's ruling with regard to a Yevamah who committed adultery with another man. What does Rav Hamnuna say in this regard?
click for answer

11)
(a) According to Rav Hamnuna, what does ...
1. ... Rav now mean when he says 'Yevamah Harei Hi k'Eshes Ish'?
2. ... Shmuel mean when he says 'Einah k'Eshes Ish'?
(b) As a final alternative, Abaye explains the Machlokes with regard to Kidushin taking effect on a Yevamah. What do Rav and Shmuel respectively hold?
(c) But did they not already dispute this issue earlier in the Perek?
click for answer

Next Daf

Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Yevamos

OTHER D.A.F. RESOURCES ON THIS DAF
Insights
 • 
Background
 • 
Point by Point
Outline
 • 
Halachah
Outlines
 • 
English Charts
& Graphics

Review
Quiz
 • 
Hebrew
Charts
 • 
Yosef
Da'as
 • 
Chidonim
 • 
Galei
Masechta
 • 
Lectures:Iyun
or Archaeology

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page



See the Daf

Sponsorships & Donations  •  Readers' Feedback
Mailing Lists  •  Archives  •  Ask the Kollel
Dafyomi Weblinks  •  Dafyomi Calendar
Chomer b'Ivrit

Hear the Daf