93b----------------------------------------93b
4)
(a) Rebbi Yanai believed that he had done the wrong thing - because the previous night, he had dreamt of a Pasuk "Kanah Ratzutz", which he thought referred to a Pasuk in Melachim, which has negative connotations. Who was the 'Kanah Ratzutz' on which Yisrael were being accused of relying?
(b) How did Rebbi Chiya reassure him from a Pasuk in Yeshayah that he had nothing to worry about?
click for answer
5)
(a) Rebbi too, holds 'Adam Makneh Davar she'Lo Ba Le'olam'. How does Rebbi explain the Pasuk in Ki Setzei "Lo Sasgir Eved el Adonav"?
(b) And so do Rebbi Meir, Rebbi Eliezer ben Yakov and Rebbi Akiva. What does Rebbi ...
1. ... Meir say in the Beraisa that we quoted on the previous Daf, following the statement of the Tana Kama 'ha'Omer l'Ishah Harei At Mekudeshes Li l'Achar she'Esgayer, l'Achar she'Tisgayri ... Einah Mekudeshes'?
2. ... Eliezer ben Yakov say in a Beraisa about someone who designates Terumah from a row of detached fruit to cover a row of fruit that is still attached, or vice-versa?
(c) What do we learn from the Pasuk in Behar "v'Asas es ha'Tevu'ah li'Shelosh ha'Shanim"?
click for answer
6)
(a) They asked Rav Sheshes whether one witness is believed to permit a woman to perform Yibum. It is obvious that, if the (main - see Tosfos DH 'Ed') reason of our Tana, who believes the witness with regard to allowing her to get married, is because a person does not lie in any matter which is destined to become public knowledge, then the same will apply when it comes to allowing her to perform Yibum. What is the other possible reason for the Tana to believing one witness?
(b) Why might this reason not apply when it comes to allowing her to perform Yibum?
(c) Rav Sheshes replied with our Mishnah 'Amru Lah Mes Bnech v'Achar-Kach Mes Ba'alech v'Nisyabmah, v'Achar-Kach Amru Lah ... '. Assuming that the Mishnah is speaking about two witnesses who overrule the testimony of the one witness who preceded them, what does he infer from there? How does that resolve the She'eilah?
(d) How do we know that the Tana is not talking about a case where the two witnesses came first (and not one)? Which two problems would establishing the Mishnah in such a case?
click for answer
Next Daf
Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Yevamos
