REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI

Prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
daf@dafyomi.co.il    http://www.dafyomi.co.il


Previous Daf
YEVAMOS 37
Question Mark
Ask A
Question

YEVAMOS 37-40 - Dedicated by Andy & Nancy Neff in memory of Leah Miriam bat Yisroel -- Lucy Rabin. Beloved mother of Nancy Neff, Valerie, Doug and Andy Rabin, and wife of Sidney Rabin, Lucy Rabin was Nifteres last Thursday (14 Sivan).

1)
(a) We just learned that, according to Ravina, even Raban Shimon ben Gamliel will agree that, if a Kohen married a Yevamah whose baby died within thirty days, she does not require Chalitzah. Rav Ashi asked Rav Oshaya Brei d'Rav Idi whether, if a Kohen married a woman who was pregnant or feeding within twenty-four months, we will make the same concession for a Kohen and permit him to remain with her without a Get. What did Rav Oshaya Brei d'Rav Idi reply?
(b) If someone betroths a woman within three months of her widowhood or divorce, and runs away, Rav Acha and Rafram argue over whether he needs to write her a Get or not. Why might writing a Get not be necessary?
(c) When a case actually took place, what ruling did Rafram issue?
click for answer

2)
(a) On what grounds did Rava ask Rav Nachman why a woman needs to wait three months, because, in case she is pregnant, we will not know whether the baby is a ninth-month baby from her first husband or a seventh-month baby from the second?
(b) On what grounds did Rava reject Rav Nachman's ...
1. ... initial answer (that in his town, the women gave birth at seven months, and not at nine)?
2. ... second answer (that, seeing as the pregnancy of all women who give birth at nine months is discernable, we automatically presume that, this woman, whose pregnancy is not discernable, has lost her 'Rov')?
(c) How do we emend Rav Nachman's words, to finally solve the problem?

3)
(a) If a man marries a woman immediately after her husband died, and she gives birth at nine months, what does the Tana Kama of the Beraisa say about ...
1. ... that baby?
2. ... the next baby that is born to him?
(b) Abaye explains that, according to the Tana Kama, the second baby is a Safek Mamzer and forbidden to marry a Vaday Mamzer. What does Rebbi Eliezer ben Yakov, who says 'Ein Mamzer mi'Safek', then hold?
(c) Rava disagrees with Abaye. How does he explain the Machlokes?
click for answer

4)
(a) We establish the Machlokes Abaye and Rava, with regard to Rebbi Elazar, who says in the Mishnah in Kidushin 'Vada'an b'Vada'an Mutar. Vada'an bi'Sefeikan, vice-versa or Sefeikan bi'Sefeikan Asur'? What is the reason for the latter part of the ruling?
(b) What are the three cases of Sefeikan?
(c) Why is a Kuti a Safek?
(d) What do we now mean by establishing the Machlokes with regard to Rebbi Elazar?
click for answer

5)
(a) We just quoted Hillel, who says that all of the ten Yuchsin are permitted to each other. Who must be precluded from the following group ...
1. ... Kohani, Levi'i, Yisraeli, Chalali?
2. ... Kohani, Levi'i, Yisraeli, Chalali, Geiri, Charuri and Avadim Meshuchrurim?
3. ... Levi'i, Yisraeli, Geiri, Charuri, Mamzeiri, Nesini, Shtuki and Asufi?
(b) In the above Machlokes between Abaye and Rava, which of the two follows the opinion of Rav (Rebbi Elazar), and which, the opinion of Shmuel (Hillel)?
click for answer


37b----------------------------------------37b

6)
(a) Abaye proves from another statement of Rebbi Eliezer ben Yakov, that he considers a Safek Mamzer like a Vadai Mamzer. What does Rebbi Eliezer ben Yakov say about a man who had relations with many women or vice-versa? From which Pasuk in Kedoshim does he derive this?
(b) How does Rava explain the word "Zimah"?
(c) What did Rebbi Eliezer ben Yakov say over and above this, regarding marrying two wives in two countries?
(d) How do we reconcile this with Rav and Rav Nachman, who would marry a woman for a short time when they traveled to distant towns (to Dardeshir and Shechintziv, respectively, despite the fact that they had wives where they lived)?
click for answer

7)
(a) We query Rav and Rav Nachman's practice from a ruling of Rava. What did Rava say about a woman who accepts a man's proposal for marriage?
(b) How do we reconcile Rav and Rav Nachman's practice with Rava's ruling?
(c) Alternatively, the Rabanan did not actually marry the women in question, but only designated them, in case they wanted to live with them. What was the point of doing that?
(d) But surely, if they intended to live with them, they would not be able to, because of Nidus, and if they did not, then what they did was pointless (see Tosfos DH 'Yichudi')?
click for answer

8)
What does Rebbi Eliezer ben Yakov in a Beraisa learn from the Pasuk in Mishlei "Al Tachresh al Re'echa Ra'ah, v'Hu Yoshev la'Vetach Itcha"?
click for answer

9)
(a) We now discuss a case where the Safek (son of the first [deceased] husband or of the second one) and the Yavam both claim the inheritance of the first husband. What is each one's argument?
(b) What is the Halachah?
click for answer

10)
(a) What does each side argue in a case where the Safek and the sons of the Yavam both claim the inheritance of the first husband?
(b) The Rabanan suggested to Rav Mesharshaya that this was similar to the Mishnah in Nos'in al ha'Anusah, which talks about the Safek (seventh-month first husband, ninth-month second one) against the sons of the two husbands. What does the Mishnah rule there?
(c) What would the equivalent Din be here?
(d) Rav Mesharshaya told them that the cases were not even similar. Why not? What will the Din therefore be in our case?
click for answer

11)
(a) Rav Mesharshaya therefore compares the Mishnah in Nos'in al ha'Anusah to the Safek and the sons of the Yavam who are both claiming the inheritance of the Yavam. Having already received a half of the first brother's property, what is the Safek now claiming?
(b) Under what circumstances would he be interested in doing this?
(c) Rebbi Aba says 'Kam Dina'. What does 'Kam Dina' mean?
(d) What does Rav Yirmeyahu say?
click for answer

12)
(a) And we query their Machlokes in that it appears to mimic a Machlokes in Kesuvos between Admon and the Rabanan, who argue over a case where someone who owned a field that was surrounded by four other fields, goes overseas, and when he returns nobody remembers through whose field his path led. According to Admon, he may take the shortest route (which will be explained shortly). What do the Rabanan say?
(b) Why do we initially think that Admon is right?
(c) What does Rav Yehudah Amar Rav say that makes us wonder how Admon could ever have said such a thing?
(d) What does Rava mean when he says that if four came on the strength of four or on the strength of one, even Admon will agree?
click for answer

13)
(a) And the Machlokes is in a case when one man comes on the strength of four. Admon maintains that the owner of the single field can claim a path 'mi'Mah Nafshach' (seeing as the four fields are owned by a sole owner, who cannot deny that, originally, he [the owner of the middle field] had a path leading to his field). What do the Rabanan say?
(b) Why do we try to establish Rebbi Aba (whom we just quoted) like the Rabanan, and Rav Yirmeyahu like Admon?
(c) Why will ...
1. ... Rebbi Aba nevertheless maintain that even Admon agrees with him?
2. ... Rav Yirmeyahu say maintain even the Rabanan agree with him?
click for answer

Next Daf

Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Yevamos

OTHER D.A.F. RESOURCES ON THIS DAF
Insights
 • 
Background
 • 
Point by Point
Outline
 • 
Halachah
Outlines
 • 
English Charts
& Graphics

Review
Quiz
 • 
Hebrew
Charts
 • 
Yosef
Da'as
 • 
Chidonim
 • 
Galei
Masechta
 • 
Lectures:Iyun
or Archaeology

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page



See the Daf

Sponsorships & Donations  •  Readers' Feedback
Mailing Lists  •  Archives  •  Ask the Kollel
Dafyomi Weblinks  •  Dafyomi Calendar
Chomer b'Ivrit

Hear the Daf