(Mishnah): If one desecrates Shabbos through something that is Chayav Kares for Mezid and Chayav Korban b'Shogeg (if he was Mezid and warned, he is Chayav Misah).

One who curses his father or mother is liable only if he curses with Hash-m's name;

R. Meir says, if he cursed with a Kinuy he is liable. Chachamim exempt.

One is liable (Skilah) for Bi'ah with a Na'arah Me'orasah only if she is a Na'arah (within six months of adulthood), a virgin, and Arusah in her father's house.

If two men had Bi'ah with her, the first is stoned, and the second is choked.

(Gemara): Which Lav forbids Chilul Shabbos? "Lo Sa'aseh Kol Melachah."

What is the source for Kares? "Ki Kol h'Oseh Bo Melachah v'Nichresah."

What is the source for punishment? "Mechaleleha Mos Yumas."

Implied question: It should teach 37 Kerisus in the Torah! (I.e. we should add all the Melachos. Since above we asked that it should teach 37, we said so also here.)

Answer (R. Yosi bei R. Bun): If he did all of them Shogeg about Shabbos and Mezid about the Melachos (he forgot that it is Shabbos, but he remembered that these Melachos are forbidden) he is liable only once. (Therefore, Shabbos is counted as only one Kares.)

Which Lav forbids cursing one's mother and father? "Ish Imo v'Aviv Tira'u."

What is the source for punishment and Kares? "U'Mekalel Aviv v'Imo Mos Yumas", and it says "Ki Kol Asher Ya'aseh mi'Kol ha'To'evos ha'Eleh v'Nichresu."

One who has Bi'ah with a Na'arah Me'orasah [is stoned only if she is a Na'arah]. R. Yosa in the name of R. Yochanan, and R. Chiya in the name of R. Lazar said that this is like R. Meir. However, Rabanan say [that he is stoned] even for a minor.

What is Rabanan's reason? [Na'arah] is written in the Parshah like Na'ar, lacking [a Hei. This alludes to a minor.]

Question: What does R. Meir learn from Na'ar [written Chaser? He should agree to Rabanan!]

Answer (R. Avahu citing Reish Lakish): One Na'arah is written complete in the Parshah [of Motzi Shem Ra], and it teaches about the entire Parshah, that she is an adult.

Question (R. Meir to Rabanan): Regarding Motzi Shem Ra it is written only Na'ar [except for one place], and she is an adult, for a minor is not stoned!

Answer (R. Avin): [Na'ar teaches that the same applies if] he had Bi'ah with her in [the anus, i.e.] the way of a male [who is Nishkav].

Question (R. Yakov bar Aba, to Rav): What is the law of one who had Bi'ah with a minor?

Answer (Rav): He is stoned.

Question (R. Yakov bar Aba, to Rav): What is the law of one who had Bi'ah with a Bogeres?

Answer (Rav): I apply to her "Na'arah", and not a Bogeres. (He is choked, like for a Nesu'ah.)

Question (Rav, to R. Yakov bar Aba): Do you not agree that one is fined [for raping or enticing a minor Besulah who is single? Likewise, a minor is like a Na'arah for Skilah!]

Answer (R. Yakov bar Aba): "Tachas Asher Inah" includes a minor for a fine. [We should say that] "Tachas Asher Inah" includes a Bogeres for a fine!

(Rav): Even though R. Yakov bar Aba rebutted me, the Halachah is, one who has Bi'ah with a minor [Me'urasah Besulah] is stoned, and she is exempt.

(R. Avin citing Shmuel): Why didn't [Rav] prove his Halachah from "u'Mes ha'Ish Asher Shachav Imah Levado"? Do we not [already] know that the girl is not Chayav Misah? Why does it say "vela'Na'arah Lo Sa'aseh Davar Ein la'Na'arah Chet Maves"? Rather, it teaches that one who has Bi'ah with a minor is stoned, and she is exempt.