21b----------------------------------------21b
4)
(a) On what grounds does the Beraisa rules that if someone says 'Yadi Nezirah, v'Ragli Nezirah' he is not a Nazir, whereas if he says 'Roshi Nezirah, Keveidi Nezirah'he is?
(b) How does Rav Yehudah reconcile this with our Mishnah, which declares someone who says 'Pi k'Fiv v'Sa'ari k'Sa'aro' a Nazir? How does he establish our Mishnah?
click for answer
5)
(a)They asked whether a husband's Hafarah of his wife's Nedarim works retroactively (like that of a Chacham), or whether he only annuls it from now on. What are the ramifications of this She'eilah with regard to her friend who said 'va'Ani'?
(b) What other ramifications might we have stated?
(c) Seeing as a Chacham uproots the Neder retroactively, why might a husband not be able to do so?
click for answer
6)
(a) We initially try to prove that a husband annuls his wife's Nedarim retroactively from the fact that, in our Mishnah, when a woman declared a Neder Nezirus and, after saying 'va'Ani', her husband annulled her Neder, his annulment is void (because he is not empowered to annul his own Nedarim, as we explained earlier). Why in fact, will his Hafarah not be effective even if it only works from now on?
(b) Under what condition will it nevertheless be effective?
click for answer
7)
(a) The Beraisa discusses the Korbanos of a Nezirah whose husband has annulled her Nezirus. What will happen to the animal which she designated as her Chatas, after her husband annulled her Nezirus, assuming that the animal was ...
1. ... his? Why is that?
2. ... hers?
(b) Does, in the former case, should the animal require redemption at all?
click for answer
8)
(a) How do we try to resolve our She'eilah from the Beraisa?
(b) We refute this proof however, on the basis of Rebbi Elazar ha'Kapar. What does he say? How will that explain the Beraisa?
(c) Why is her Chatas not sent in a field to graze, so that, when it obtains a blemish, the owner will be able to redeem it?
click for answer
9)
(a) How do we attempt to resolve our She'eilah from the next Mishnah, which sentences a Nezirah who drank wine or made herself Tamei Mes to Malkus?
(b) On what grounds do we not at first want to establish the Beraisa where her husband had not yet annulled her Nezirus?
click for answer
10)
(a) Then how do we nevertheless establish the Beraisa? Why is it now all right to do so?
(b) Why does the Tana find it necessary to teach us that she does not receive Malkus in this case? Is that too, not obvious?
(c) Why does the Tana not issue the same ruling, but even if she drank wine or made herself Tamei Mes before her husband annulled her Nezirus (seeing as we are currently holding that her husband annuls her Nedarim retroactively)?
click for answer
Next Daf
Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Nazir
