60b----------------------------------------60b
7)
(a) The Beraisa cites a case of 'Harei Zeh Gitech Al-Menas she'Titni li Masayim Zuz, Af-Al-Pi she'Niskara ha'Get O she'Avad'. What does the Tana rule there ...
1. ... with regard to the validity of the Get?
2. ... with regard to getting married on account of it?
(b) In another Beraisa, the Tana Kama rules that if, in the same case, the husband then dies before she has fulfilled the condition, she is subject to the Mitzvah of Yibum. What does Raban Shimon ben Gamliel say?
(c) What is the basis of their Machlokes?
(d) The first Beraisa is clearly a support for Rav Huna. How can we extrapolate his opinion even from the second one?
click for answer
8)
(a) How will Rav Yehudah reconcile his opinion with the two Beraisos that we just discussed (and both of which support Rav Huna)?
(b) When Rebbi Zeira lived in Bavel, he maintained that Rav Huna Amar Rebbi's statement 'Kol ha'Omer Al-Menas k'Omer me'Achshav Dami' was indeed the opinion of Rebbi alone, and that the Rabanan disagree with him. After he arrived in Eretz Yisrael, what did he learn from Rebbi Asi Amar Rebbi Yochanan?
(c) In which case do the Rabanan argue with Rebbi?
(d) What support do we bring for this opinion?
click for answer
9)
(a) According to Rav Yehudah, who maintains that the Chachamim also argue by 'Al-Menas', why does the Tana of the Beraisa only cite the case of 'me'Hayom u'le'Achar Miysah'?
(b) Why does he not rather cite the case of 'Al-Menas' to teach us that even there, the Rabanan invalidate the Get?
(c) Why does the Tana find it necessary to teach us that if, in the case of 'Al-Menas she'Etein lach Masayim Zuz mi'Ka'an v'Ad Sheloshim Yom', and he fails to fulfill the condition, the Get is not valid? Is this not obvious?
(d) And what does the Tana mean when he says ...
1. ... 'Al-Menas she'Yesh li Masayim Zuz, Harei Zu Mekudeshes v'Yesh lo' (implying that, otherwise, she would not be Mekudeshes)? Why would we not suspect that he may possess two hundred Zuz, without our being aware of it (as indeed, is stated in a Beraisa)?
2. ... 've'Im Her'ah lah Al ha'Shulchan, Einah Mekudeshes'? Is that not obvious?
click for answer
10)
(a) The our Mishnah rules 'Al-Menas she'Yesh li Beis Kur Afar, Harei Zu Mekudeshes v'Yesh lo' (implying that, otherwise, she would not be Mekudeshes). How much is ...
1. ... a Beis Sa'ah?
2. ... a Beis Kur?
(b) How much is this in terms of a square?
(c) What does the Tana mean when he implies that, if he did possess a Beis Kur of earth, she would not be Mekudeshes? Why do we not suspect that he may possess a Beis Kur of earth, without our being aware of it (as indeed, is stated in a Beraisa)?
(d) Having just taught us this very same Halachah in the case of Metaltelin, why does the Tana find it necessary to repeat it by Karka?
click for answer
11)
(a) Why does the Tana need to inform us that if the Mekadesh stipulated that he had earth in one place, and he has it in another, she is not betrothed? Why might we have thought otherwise?
(b) If he stipulated 'Al-Menas she'Ar'ech Beis Kur Afar', he is obligated to show her his own earth, the Tana of the Beraisa explains, because that is what she had in mind when she asked for this condition to be inserted in the Kidushin (as we learned earlier). But why does the Tana need to add 've'Im Her'ah b'Bik'ah, Einah Mekudeshes'? How do we establish the Mishnah in order to create a Chidush?
click for answer
Next Daf
Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Kidushin
