43b----------------------------------------43b
7)
(a) Rav Chisda speaks about a Chetzyah Shifchah v'Chetzyah bas Chorin who became betrothed to Reuven, was set free and became betrothed to his brother Shimon. If both brothers die, he says, Levi may perform Yibum with her. Why might we have thought otherwise?
(b) To which case in Yevamos is this similar? What is the source of the Isur there?
(c) Then on what grounds is he nevertheless permitted to perform Yibum with her?
(d) How come that we do not know to which of the two brothers she was in fact, betrothed?
click for answer
8)
(a) If a Chetzyah Shifchah v'Chetzyah bas Chorin is betrothed to Reuven and, after she is set free, she becomes betrothed to Shimon, Rav Yosef Amar Rav Nachman rules 'Pak'i Kidushei Rishon'. What does he mean and why?
(b) What does Rebbi Zeira Amar Rav Nachman say?
(c) How does Rebbi Zeira attempt to prove his opinion from (an inference from) the Pasuk in Ki Setzei "Lo Yumsu Ki Lo Chufashah"?
(d) How do we counter this proof from Rebbi Yishmael (in similar fashion to the way that Rav Sheshes did on the previous Amud)?
click for answer
9)
(a) So how do we finally make the inference from the Pasuk "Lo Yumsu Ki Lo Chufashah"?
(b) What did Rav Huna (or Chana) bar Ketina Amar Rebbi Yitzchak relate about a certain Chatzi Shifchah v'Chatzi bas Chorin?
(c) We suggest that this follows the opinion of Rebbi Yochanan ben Berokah. What does Rebbi Yochanan ben Berokah say about the Mitzvah of "Peru u'Rvu"?
(d) How does Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak establish the case even according to the Rabanan?
click for answer
10)
(a) Our Mishnah rules that if someone sells his Eved to a Nochri, the Eved goes free. This might be speaking when the Eved ran away from the Nochri. How would it be speaking even if he did not?
(b) What is the source for the obligation to redeem him?
(c) In which other case did Chazal issue a similar decree?
(d) According to the Tana Kama of a Beraisa, if someone sells his Eved to a Nochri, the Eved goes free, but he requires a Get Shichrur. Raban Shimon ben Gamliel restricts this to where he did not write 'Ono', which is as good as a Get Shichrur. What is 'Ono'?
click for answer
11)
(a) The Tana of another Beraisa says that if a master borrows money from a Nochri against his Eved, then, as soon as the Nochri arranges 'Nimuso', he goes free. Rav Huna bar Yehudah interpret Nimuso to mean 'Nashki'. What is Nashki?
(b) The Tana of yet another Beraisa states that Arisim, Chakiros, Arisei Batei Avos and Nochrim who take the field as a security for their debt, are Patur from Ma'asros, even if they arranged 'Nimuso'. What are ...
1. ... Arisim?
2. ... Chakiros?
3. ... Arisei Batei Avos?
(c) What Chidush is this Beraisa coming to teach us?
(d) On which principle is this ruling based?
click for answer
12)
(a) Rav Sheshes queries Rav Huna bar Yehudah's interpretation of 'Nimuso' from the previous Beraisa. What is the problem?
(b) So how does he explain 'Asah Lo Nimuso'? What does 'Zeman' mean?
click for answer
13)
(a) We try to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the Beraisa concerning the Eved which holds that once the Nochri writes Zeman, it is considered as if the Eved was his, and the Beraisa concerning the field, which holds that the field is not his, by establishing the former when the time to claim had already arrived, and the latter, when it had not. On what grounds do we reject this answer?
(b) So we draw a distinction between the Guf and the Peiros. What does this mean?
(c) Alternatively, we establish both cases by the actual Guf, and the latter Beraisa speaks when the Nochri borrowed on the understanding that the Yisrael will take his field, but to date he has not yet done so. On what grounds ...
1. ... is the field Patur from Ma'asros?
2. ... under similar circumstances (where the Nochri did not yet claim the Eved) do we nevertheless penalize the Yisrael?
click for answer
Next Daf
Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Gitin
