CHARTS ON THE DAILY DAF

brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Yerushalayim
daf@dafyomi.co.il http://www.dafyomi.co.il

CHULIN CHART #2
Chulin Daf 132a

THE ARGUMENT BETWEEN REBBI ELIEZER AND THE CHACHAMIM
(A)
REBBI ELIEZER (1) (B)
CHACHAMIM (2)

1a) KISUY HA'DAM FOR THE OFFSPRING OF
A MALE DEER AND A FEMALE GOAT Chayav Chayav mi'Safek

1b) KISUY HA'DAM FOR THE OFFSPRING OF
A MALE GOAT AND A FEMALE DEER Chayav mi'Safek Chayav

2a) MATANOS FOR THE OFFSPRING OF
A MALE DEER AND A FEMALE GOAT Patur Chayav (3)

2b) MATANOS FOR THE OFFSPRING OF
A MALE GOAT AND A FEMALE DEER Patur Patur

FOOTNOTES:

(1) Both Rebbi Eliezer and the Chachamim are in doubt about whether we take into account the animal's father. They argue whether the animal must be a full Seh in order to be Chayav, or whether even a partial Seh is Chayav. Rebbi Eliezer maintains that the Mitzvos of Kisuy ha'Dam and Matanos are done only for a full "Seh," and not for a "Miktzas Seh" ("partial Seh").

(2) The Chachamim maintain that the Mitzvos of Kisuy ha'Dam and Matanos are done only for a Seh and *even* a Miktzas Seh.

(3) Rav Huna bar Chiya explains that the Chachamim maintain that the owner must give *half* of the Matanos (for the half of the animal that comes from the female goat; in order for the Kohen to claim the other half of the Matanos, he must bring proof that we do not follow the animal's father).

MAIN CHULIN PAGE

OTHER D.A.F. RESOURCES ON MASECHES CHULIN

Insites
to the Daf • Tosfos
Summaries • Outlines
of the Daf • Halachah
Outlines • Background
to the Daf • Review
Q & A

טבלאות
בעברית • גלי
מסכתא • יוסף
דעת • Multiple
Choice Quiz • Revach
l'Daf •
Podcasts

D.A.F. Home Page

Sponsorships & Donations •  Readers' Feedback
Mailing Lists •  Archives •  Ask the Kollel
Dafyomi Weblinks •  Dafyomi Calendar