WHEN HAZAMAH CANCELS THE ENTIRE TESTIMONY (Yerushalmi Perek 7 Halachah 3 Daf 31b)
åúðé ëï à''ø éåñé áîä ãáøéí àîåøéí áùúé òãéåú åáùúé äúøéåú àáì áòãåú àçú åáäúøééä àçú ëì òãåú ùáèìä î÷öúä áèìä ëåìä.
Support #1 (Beraisa - R. Yosi): What is the case? It is when there were two testimonies and two warnings, but if it was one testimony and one warning, any testimony that is partially Batel is totally Batel;
îäå ùáèìä î÷öúä áèìä ëåìä.
Question: What is the case in which [testimony] that is partially Batel is totally Batel?
[ãó ëç òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] äéå òåîãéï åîòéãéï òìéå áòùøä áðéñï ùâðá ùåø áàçã áðéñï èáç åîëø áòùøä áðéñï äåæîå áçîùä òùø áðéñï ëì òãåú ùäòéãå îòùøä áðéñï òã çîùä òùø áðéñï ìîôøéòä äøé àéìå ôñåìåú.
Answer: If they testified on the 10th of Nisan that he stole an ox on Nisan 1, and he slaughtered or sold it on Nisan 10, and they were Huzam on Nisan 15, all testimonies that they testified from Nisan 10 until Nisan 15, retroactively they are Pasul.
à''ø áà áø îîì úéôúø áîòéãéï òìéå áëøê àçã åìéú ùîòú îéðä ìëìåí.
Rebuttal (R. Ba bar Mamal): The case is, they testify about [theft and sale] at once, so you cannot learn from here anything. (If he was not there to see one, he was not there to see the other, so he was Huzam about both of them. We explained this like HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA.)
[ãó ìá òîåã à] åúðé ëï äï äéå øàùåðéí åäï äéå äàçøåðéí. äåæîå áøàùåðä àéï áëê ëìåí áùðééä äøé àéìå òãåú àçã ùìéùéú äøé àéìå ùúé òãéåú.
Support #2 (Tosefta): If the first were also the last (the same two witnesses testified about all three years of Chazakah), if they were Huzam about the first [year], there is no [testimony] at all. [If they were Huzam] about the second, there is one testimony (testimony about the first year remains. If they were Huzam) about the third, there are two testimonies (those of the first two years).
åäéëé ãîé àí áîòéãéï òìéå áëøê àçã åìéú ùîò îéðä ëìåí.
Question: What is the case? If you will say that the testimony is at once, and you do not learn from here at all [this cannot be, for they testify about different years]!
ìà àúééà ãà àìà òì éãé òãåú ñâéà.
Answer: This must discuss separate testimonies [and we properly learn that an Ed Zomem is disqualified retroactively. We explained this like NESIVOS YERUSHALAYIM.]