79b----------------------------------------79b
7)
(a) How do we now amend Rabah's interpretation of the Machlokes? In which case do they really argue?
(b) And what will both Tana'im hold in the case of a field and a tree?
(c) We now have two Machlokos, one in the Reisha and one in the Seifa. What is the basis of their Machlokes in the Reisha (where the water and the doves came after the Hekdesh, and) where the Tana Kama holds ' ... Ein Mo'alin ba'Meh she'be'Tocho' and Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon holds 'Mo'alin'?
click for answer
8)
(a) On what condition does Rebbi Meir hold 'Makneh Davar she'Lo Ba le'Olam'?
(b) It is not Rebbi Meir himself who draws this distinction, but Rav Huna, who holds like him. What example does Rav Huna give of something that is 'Avidi de'asu'?)
(c) Then how can we establish Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon like Rebbi Meir in the case of ...
1. ... the water in the pit?
2. ... the doves in the dove-cot (neither of which appears to be inevitable at all)?
(d) What if the dove-cot that is close by belongs to somebody else?
(e) Why is that?
click for answer
9)
(a) How does Rava establish the declaration of Hekdesh in the Seifa (where the water and the doves were there before the Hekdesh)?
(b) And to explain Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon ('Ein Mo'alin ba'Meh she'be'Tocho'), he establishes him like his father in 'ha'Mocher es ha'Bayis'. What does Rebbi Shimon say there about someone who sells a pit which is full of water (though that is not the actual case of Rebbi Shimon there)?
(c) What does his son Rebbi Elazar now hold?
(d) Then why does he hold in the Reisha (where the Hekdesh preceded the water and the doves) 'Mo'alin bo u'va'Meh she'be'Tocho'? Why does he not apply the S'vara 'Makdish, be'Ayin Ra'ah Makdish' there too?
click for answer
10)
(a) How does Rava reconcile this with our Mishnah 'Machar Bor, Machar Meimehah'? Like whom does he establish it in order to consolidate his explanation?
click for answer
11)
(a) We just established our Mishnah like Rebbi Nasan (whom we referred to as an individual opinion). Why does it not necessarily follow that the Halachah is not like him?
(b) Then why do we refer to it as an individual opinion?
(c) Would the same apply if an Amora, in refuting a Kashya directed at him from a Stam Mishnah, answered 'Yechida'ah Hi'?
(d) What might the Rabbanan of Rebbi Nasan ('Hikdishan Melei'in, Mo'alin Bahen u'va'Meh she'be'Tochan') then hold?
click for answer
Next Daf
Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Bava Basra
